The Instigator
brysonb
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Shibani
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Should gay marriages be allowed?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/18/2019 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 448 times Debate No: 119955
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

brysonb

Con

No, There shouldn't be gay marriages. How were you born, From a male and female. Not male and male. Not female and female. Think of that for a second.
Shibani

Pro

A marriage is a broad and complex entity. It has various aspects to it, The most vital of which is love. This constitution should not, And cannot, Be narrowed down to a single requirement of producing offspring. It is detestable how the society puts the argument of 'reproduction' forward to dismiss homosexual relationships as invalid. You need not worry, The human race will not go extinct anytime soon. There is a pretty good number of people who are heterosexual and actively making babies.
Debate Round No. 1
brysonb

Con

brysonb forfeited this round.
Shibani

Pro

Shibani forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
brysonb

Con

brysonb forfeited this round.
Shibani

Pro

Shibani forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
backwardseden
christ never stated one damn word about being gay nor transgender. Yet strangely christians and only christians like packs of wolves and the whooping cough are against being gay/ transgender. And they also have the $$$$$ to back them. Otherwise being gay/ transgender here in this country would fizzle like a used hamburger of pure blackened ash and those who are gay/ transgender would be able to live their lives as they see fit. And the other thing is, Is there's no reason "why" christians hate gays/ transgenders in their greasy hate filled bible"s or in person other than it is what it is. Yeah. Talk about being totally 100% immoral and fickle. But then again, That's exactly what christianity and god is as god is based on hate as he hates children. Ah yes, Being gay is an outlet for christians to either hate, Or learn to hate and they love it in return, Just as their god of the printed bible wants.
Posted by John_C_1812_II 3 years ago
John_C_1812_II
@ Athias
Gay marriage is not a legal union made of state. It places legal I. D. As a sexual innuendo on all witnesses as a united state that knowingly does not have an outcome on the posterity of a nation directly. The witness is placed in a position to tell a lie on an official document as the witness of two people. A legal union of same gender public interaction of this kind, By precedent of state is either already a private corporation, By registration, With a title of company incorporation identification number which is not a plagiarism of marriage, This choice with a much higher cost due to possibly overregulation, And double taxation in some regard by governing states.
A united more perfect union of basic truth, And of whole truth which can be repeated publicly like BiniVir, Or in the description of woman, UnosMulier. Is a type of witness account that can even be used to identify woman and men of science who themselves by independence assume burden of a nation"s posterity by practicing fertilization with donated human property that are not their own. You should keep in mind a Church of impartial religion can identify with this type of witnessing with clear moral ethics, And without dangers of being directed into criminal perjury. Even though the religious organization is not capable itself to quickly identifying, Proving, Or translate the complex crime of perjury into basic principle to others with its own constitutional trial.
The idea is a witness can perjure themselves in a court of law while under oath tells why that lie of separation should not be left to lean heavily on the society to set this perjury up as a common defense is self-evident.
Posted by Athias 3 years ago
Athias
Normally, I'd agree with the proposition that homosexuals subject to the standards of the Church should not be given the legal privilege to marry. However, Since the Church allied itself with the State, Particularly in forming legal unions, The Church has subjected its ritual to referendum.
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.