The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
3 Points

Should teens play violet video games?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/13/2017 Category: Games
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 825 times Debate No: 101932
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)




I think so cause if you knew you were gonna do bad stuff then don't buy the games i mean it's not the owners who caused it or our thought its your thought cause you brought the game knowing that you would end up doing all those bad stuff like in the game.

Both the psychological association and the American Academy of Pediatrics suggest that parents take an active interest in and monitor the games played by their children. This simple bit of practical advice -- and not an all-out prohibition -- may be the best solution.


I disagree with teenagers playing video games that involve mostly the color purple/violet. These games tend to be low quality, cheap games. No person, let alone teenagers, should play these games.;

These are my sources.
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Islaynubs 3 years ago
xD i only play call of duty friday-sunday
Posted by Richard_Lyman 3 years ago
As long as they only spend like an hour or two a day and have a social life outside Call of Duty.
Posted by RR-MKIV 3 years ago
I know right. Last I checked I didn't buy DOOM or download Warframe with the intention of becoming a violent felon in the future. Its simply about moderation. I manage my time by playing some games, and the rest [Which is the majority] on non-virtual activities.
Posted by SirHarrison0 3 years ago
how's autism treating you
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by PowerPikachu21 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: 1 Round debate + Game changing typo? Contender wins by default, as he was able to show that "teens shouldn't play violet games", since they're cheap and not worth it. Even if the title did say "violent", Con merely says to monitor these teens, not any form of ban. Remember that 1 round debates make the Instigator unable to rebut any arguments, and no clarification to make up for the purple games. While the title did contain a crucial typo, both Pro and Con's S&G inside the debate were good, so that'll stay tied. Both sides used 2 sources each, and neither was mean.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.