The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Should there be a Slavic union?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
pfilipo has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/28/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 334 times Debate No: 105372
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




There should be a Slavic union to tighten the relations between different Slavic countries as the EU functions for some European countries.


Thank you for starting the debate.
Well, let's start simple. Before we can even go to the benefits of a slavic union, it's highly likely that this won't work.
Slavic countries don't really like each other. They have bad relationships with each other. There's a reason why they haven't really bonded to fight terrorists.
So to force the union to happen, other countries such as Europeans and Americans have to intervene. Which is just what a lot of slavic countries hate. This creates more tension between the westerners and the Slavs. Oh, a union might happen between the Slavis countries. But it would be a union for the sole cause of driving the westerners out of their countries. A Slavic union would cause more problems than benefits.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.