The Instigator
chaseman
Con (against)
The Contender
minipaulq
Pro (for)

Should trump be president??

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
minipaulq has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/21/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 385 times Debate No: 114139
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

chaseman

Con

Trump is racist, that's why he should not be president. Along with him being a 3-year-old in an old man's body, who should have been aborted the second he was conceived.
minipaulq

Pro

First of all you don't have any facts. He was also not proven to be a rapist and in fact some were even proven wrong. He made a lot questionable decisions and some was down right stupid but he isn't a dumb white rich man. He was able to be rich cause he was smart. He isn't the best president but he isn't the worst. You might say Donald Trump bombed Syria yet Hilary Clinton want to nuke Syria. Also you have no fact proven why he was a rapist.
Debate Round No. 1
chaseman

Con

Considering Trump is NOT a rapist he IS racist. He said that he wanted to deport all immigrants and build a wall to keep them out. When Kim jong un said "I can destroy you with a press of a button." and Trump said " I will just push my BIGGER button." This saying he is threatening Koreans.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
John_C_1812
oops sorry for the double post, I did post this comment once.
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
John_C_1812
President is a term that is not dictated by the democracy it is an expression of ability that takes place between a united State a President can create and the United States Constitution. President describes a basic principle of representation by single united state set before the United States Constitution.
A democracy can vote on a candidate to presidency but a person can simple display the ability to be executive officer. President is a witness account described by basic Principle. Should Mr. Trump be President? Yes. Does executive officer Trump have to be President because he was elected by the people democratically? No. Do people have to call the Executive officer President? No. Can a person prove that an executive officer is not President of a legal United State set before the United States Constitution? Yes.

The United State between President and executive officer is not one that need be based on crime, impeachment is the charge of a crime for removing a person from both Executive office, and Presidency. President can simple be proven by means of a lack of formation to a United State set against America"s Constitution. The idea that has be interpreted to us about the witness account of President was shaped by the truth it sounds sexist. When in fact it is not, it is a witness account that is presented in it most basic principle of legal precedent. It was an elaborate or fancy way to say a man who sits before the law for the future of all men as witness.

The misunderstanding is this account is not about power it is about understanding the ability of Constitutional separation and how law shapes things we describe as to prevent perjury of large numbers of people as it relates to learning details of fact.
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
John_C_1812
President is a term that is not dictated by the democracy it is an expression of ability that takes place between a united State a President can create and the United States Constitution. President describes a basic principle of representation by single united state set before the United States Constitution.
A democracy can vote on a candidate to presidency but a person can simple display the ability to be executive officer. President is a witness account described by basic Principle. Should Mr. Trump be President? Yes. Does executive officer Trump have to be President because he was elected by the people democratically? No. Do people have to call the Executive officer President? No. Can a person prove that an executive officer is not President of a legal United State set before the United States Constitution? Yes.

The United State between President and executive officer is not one that need be based on crime, impeachment is the charge of a crime for removing a person from both Executive office, and Presidency. President can simple be proven by means of a lack of formation to a United State set against America"s Constitution. The idea that has be interpreted to us about the witness account of President was shaped by the truth it sounds sexist. When in fact it is not, it is a witness account that is presented in it most basic principle of legal precedent. It was an elaborate or fancy way to say a man who sits before the law for the future of all men as witness.

The misunderstanding is this account is not about power it is about understanding the ability of Constitutional separation and how law shapes things we describe as to prevent perjury of large numbers of people as it relates to learning details of fact.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.