The Instigator
kidfor_pres
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Moreno2
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Should we have a kid president

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Moreno2
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/30/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 471 times Debate No: 114749
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

kidfor_pres

Pro

We need to have a kid president-AND a normal president. No age limit, well above 8 but think I think of ways to help homeless people all the time! its just I can't do much because why? I'm just a dumb little kid!
Moreno2

Con

No underages should be governing a country, and yes you might be right, you cant do anything about it exactly because you are a kid, a few reasons for you not being able to:

1. Adults frequently know way more than kids when it comes to politics and economics, so the ways of helping the poor you mention might just be doing harm to the country's economy in general, and then basically everyone will be poor because you helped the poor, kinda ironic.
2 . Underaged people are often filled with bias created by their parents and that stuff, it takes time for you to create your own opinions and actually challenge your parents' opinions.
3. Underaged people are not fully developed yet, and that would be the main reason I guess, their brain is not as developed as the people running for president and dont understand that the world isnt perfect and everything can have an easy solution, that being said, if you stick to your ideas till you are over 18, you should run for whatever job you pick, wish you luck.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by SJM 3 years ago
SJM
kidfor_presMoreno2Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't provide an argument. Pro provided an opinion. For an opinion to turn into an argument, you must do more than just provide a claim, you must provide a warrant. Pro did not provide a reason why, therefore arguments default to Con.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.