Should we use well-known or local celebrity endorsement for a multinational company
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Warik
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/24/2014 | Category: | Education | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,251 times | Debate No: | 59496 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
 Con Pro Another problem of the well known celebrity is their popularity might hide the very message that the advertisers wanted to send. Celebrities popularity can and often overshadow the product and cause one to never remember the product. Hence it hurts the ROI (return on investment). http://frog-dog.com... Meanwhile it would be far cheaper to get a celebrity that is locally known as they would be far cheaper and the ROI would be far higher while the risk would be far lower. http://www.forbes.com... |
 |
|
Con Sunnyle forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
|
Con Sunnyle forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| Sunnyle | Warik | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF
