The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Should women have rights?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
DessieTheNessie has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/14/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 741 times Debate No: 102987
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (9)
Votes (0)




Yes. Women are people to. I am sure this has already been a debate but I really wanted to see if I could get people to change their minds. I think it's sad even 21% thinks women shouldn't. Women are people to. They are the key of people. So please take your time to listen to this debate. Please take your time to listen to this ACTUAL issue.


Thanks for instigating this debate, Pro.
I believe this is an actual issue as well, and it deserves some discussing.
I accept the debate, but Pro didn't supply definitions.
So I will...later.


Ah, the age old question...should women have rights?
Absolutely not!
As long as I can stop it, no woman shall ever have rights while I'm around.

Women should have a good time and have fun, but saying women should have rights is just evil.
Why do we need to inflict such pain on society by giving women rights?

I personally value women and everything they do for humanity, in fact, I agree with Pro that women are key people in society.
Which is precisely why I don't think women should have *any* rights.

Look, you wanna feel like a real big man and start giving rights to all the women in your life?
Then you're just an abusive person who likes to hurt people.

You think you're cool cuz you dominate women by giving them rights?
Then you're just an insecure person who should probably go to jail for such actions.

We should be respecting women, not pounding them with rights.

Why are people so hostile towards women that they feel the need to give them any rights in the first place?
I've never given my wife any rights, and I plan on keeping it that way...she most certainly appreciates it.

*Sustained Injury*

Women sustain injuries from these rights inflicted on them, including damage to their bodies.
For this reason, we most certainly should not be giving women rights to their bodies.

Over time, too many body rights will leave women's bodies bruised, broken, and mutilated, and these sustained injuries don't need to occur if we all agree to actively avoid giving women rights to their bodies.


I don't understand why anyone would want a woman to have a right, let alone many rights.
At some point you have to admit that the resolution is sadistic, no?

Why should women have to experience such a traumatic event like getting body rights?
Should women want to be pummeled with rights?
No, and neither should men.

I negate the resolution that adult human females should experience powerful strikes given with the right fist.
I reject that women should have rights, because of how barbaric that is.


women - adult human females.

should - used to indicate obligation.

have - experience; undergo.

rights - blows given with the right fist.
(NOUN 3.7)

blows - powerful strikes with a hand.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by DessieTheNessie 9 months ago
Well...I'm an idiot. Sorry for wasting your guys's time. And I have changed in just half a year. Sowwy
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
See, I disagree.
That "seeming so dumb" is exactly what makes writing a debate round like that fun.
Giving away the funny part before it all starts would be defeating the purpose.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Your trolling would've been funnier if you started the round with your definitions. I almost stopped reading because you seemed like you were just being dumb, then I got a small smirk out of the end.
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
Your resolution, the opinion you're trying to support, has 4 words in it.
When you create a debate, put definitions for each word (4 in this case) in the 1st round of the debate, before your opponent posts.
Posted by DessieTheNessie 1 year ago
what do you mean by definitions
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
De nada.
Posted by sboss18 1 year ago
Thanks for the giggle, Con.
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
Feel free to have this debate deleted/reset or continue the debate, it doesn't matter to me.

If you don't know how to reset/delete the debate and need me to do it, let me know, if not, just keep debating.
Next time, include definitions in round 1.
Posted by NDECD1441 1 year ago
Well, women already have rights so what is the point?

Rights include the right to live and so far, not all women are dead so we can say that they have rights already.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.