The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Steve Young is a Better Quarterback than Joe Montana

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
quez1 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/8/2016 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 436 times Debate No: 97832
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




Who is the best quarterback ever? I say Peyton Manning. You may state Tom Brady. I speculate the dominant part still says Joe Montana. The idealists say Johnny Unitas, Bart Starr, or Otto Graham. On the off chance that you asked 100 individuals, you may find nine or ten distinct solutions.

Why, then, is Steve Young never among them?

By almost every measure of significance we have in expert football, Young either coordinates or surpasses the achievements of his companions. He is both factually and episodically incredible, having amassed the same number of MVPs as Brady, more All-Pro choices than John Elway, and even that desired Super Bowl ring Dan Marino put in the most recent couple of years of his profession frantically mauling for. However when the discussion of most prominent quarterback ever comes up, Steve Young is constantly forgotten.

Youthful's profession passer rating of 96.8 puts him behind just Manning and Aaron Rodgers on the untouched rundown. In spite of playing to a great extent for a similar association (Young had a stretch in Tampa Bay, Montana in Kansas City), Joe Montana is the distance down at eleventh record-breaking at 92.3. Those 3.5 focuses have a huge amount of effect in a specimen estimate as huge as a full profession. On the off chance that you consider just their time 49ers, Young's evaluating of 103.5 puts him behind just Rodgers, while Montana is 10 full focuses behind at 93.5.

Shouldn't something be said about those MVP? Just four players " Manning, Unitas, Brett Favre, and Jim Brown " have more. Brady, Montana, and Kurt Warner tie him at two. Who does he lead? That puts him in front of Marino, Elway, and Starr, three players who all around beat Young in the court of general sentiment.

You could make an exceptionally persuading contention that Young had the best pinnacle of any player in NFL history.

Presently investigate Young's crest: from 1992-1997, Young never finished under 66.7% of his passes. Tom Brady has done that precisely once, Montana twice, Marino and Elway never. He drove the NFL in fulfillment rate in five out of those six years, however don't stress, he wasn't dinking and dunking " he drove the association in yards per endeavor in four out of those six years.

Is it accurate to say that he was simply getting fortunate on a group of high-hazard passes? No, he had the class' best capture rate in two out of those four years. You could make an exceptionally persuading contention that Young had the best pinnacle of any player in NFL history.

Consider the possibility that you're just into scoring. Youthful's 1.78 touchdown passes for every begin as a 49er trail just Manning (2.04), Drew Brees (1.96), and Brady (1.86) on the unsurpassed rundown. Toss in his surging touchdowns (43 on the whole) and he gave San Francisco more than 2.2 touchdowns for each diversion, more than any other person ever.

Youthful helmetAh, Young's surging numbers. By one means or another those are constantly overlooked. Doesn't having the NFL's unsurpassed pioneer in quarterback surging touchdowns include some esteem? Don't his 4,200 yards on the ground mean something to his legacy? At 5.9 yards for every convey, he additionally happened to be more effective than any running back in NFL history. Not including Young's surging adventures would be the same as overlooking Colin Kaepernick's on a cutting edge rundown of best quarterbacks in the amusement.

Also, in case you're a wins fellow? Youthful won 73.4% of his begins as a 49er. That is superior to Montana (71.9%), and trails just Brady (77.5%) on the unequaled rundown. Yes, he just makes them ring, yet there are a few variables affecting everything there. As a matter of first importance, his pinnacle came amid the pinnacle of the '90s Cowboys, seemingly the most total group ever constructed. When the Cowboys blurred, Favre's Packers assumed control over the NFC.

Montana, then again, was the beneficiary of a lot of good fortunes with respect to his principle NFC partners. Mike Ditka's Chicago Bears never found a quarterback, Joe Gibbs' Redskins continued evolving quarterbacks (and as yet winning, in all reasonableness), and Bill Parcells and Phil Simms were so infrequently in agreement that the way that they figured out how to win two Super Bowls still scarcely bodes well. Stick Montana in an alliance with Aikman's Cowboys and Favre's Packers and he most likely just wins one ring also.

All the more significantly, consider the circumstances in San Francisco that both Montana and Young had. At the point when Montana won his initial three rings, Bill Walsh was the mentor. Walsh clearly greatly affected Young, yet he won his Super Bowl with George Seifert. Seifert is in no way, shape or form an awful mentor, however recollect that, he once went 1-15 over a full season with the Panthers. He's no Bill Walsh.

Furthermore, consider the ability around both players. In spite of the fact that they both had Jerry Rice, Young never tossed a go to Dwight Clark as a full-time starter, lost Ronnie Lott, Eric Wright, and Roger Craig in 1990, Charles Haley in 1991, Michael Carter in 1992, and Bill Romanowski in 1993. He never got the opportunity to play with Dwight Hicks, Randy Cross, or Fred Dean, all staples amid the early Montana years.

This is not to state Young had no ability around him; he clearly had a considerable amount, yet the groups he played with were by no means, in the same class as the groups Joe Montana had. Winning one ring was totally advocated.

The greatest thump on Young? His life span. He just began twofold digit amusements nine circumstances. Clearly this matters in some way or another, however there's a distinction between most noteworthy quarterback ever and most prominent profession by any quarterback ever.

In my book, most prominent quarterback ever implies the quarterback who played the position more noteworthy than any other individual. There's an extremely sensible contention to be made that Young did that. Regardless of the possibility that he didn't, you can't precisely blame Young for sitting behind Montana. That wasn't his decision. When he took the field, he was about on a par with anybody.

For the record, I have Young positioned as the second-most prominent quarterback ever. In light of his numbers and the tape, Steve Young helped out his group playing quarterback than anybody in history not named Peyton Manning. Regardless of the possibility that you don't have him very as high, you need to recognize that Young is hugely underrated by the general population. He has each privilege to be required in a dialog that never gives him almost enough credit.


You can say that those 2 are good quarter backs but lets be honest it is John Elway but if i have to choose it is joe montana
because he had better statistics and better records
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by boozeandbabble 2 years ago
Jim McMahon
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.