The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
4 Points

Stop accepting debates with the title 'How do Atheists rationally know truth from fiction?'

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/21/2017 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 563 times Debate No: 99186
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




Newcomers to, DO NOT accept ANY debate with the title 'How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?'. The guy who has been posting them, ViceRegent, is a middle-aged bigoted ignoramus with the brain capacity of a lemur, and he has been spamming this same debate for months. Please don't accept these debates. If you want, copy and paste this debate and post it yourself to spread the message :)


A Taoist path from a little dragon.

Life is often like the finger that points the way to the moon. If the energy we possess is all spent holding a finger pointing that way to the moon. We miss all the heavenly glory the large Moon holds for the beauty of a little finger in the way.
Debate Round No. 1


Yes? I agree? Good insight? :P


Yeah, I"m old insight has something to do with the way light reflects of my glasses.

Now is the time in this debate when I am moving to comedy.

Some people as they get older get cranky. We are old enough to know that we really need some-one to change are diapers. We"ve sat in enough crap to know it"s just not fun to do all day long any more.
Debate Round No. 2


In conclusion of this debate new people should be thankful they can enter debate at all. from experience not all people meet the qualifications of participation.

Let"s face facts it is not the question that is cause of resistance it is the way an answer is reposed to. There are in fact many ways an atheist can rational tell truth from fiction. May-be a goal should be governed among us to find the most basic way.
My Comment in answer form to the question, is simple not be irrational. Restriction of acceptance to participation is a tad bit irrational. A little over the top, a bit extreme, and over reacting.

Thank you for the opportunity to debate.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by John_C_1812 1 year ago
Thank you for the vote DStallman
Posted by dr.jimmythefish 1 year ago
I think as he will never stop and never make a point we should take the easy wins.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by DStallman 1 year ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I honestly don't know what this was supposed to be, but I like it. Con really sold me with the Taoism.