THBT the U.S. should continue aiding Israel in Terms of weapons and finance
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Danielle
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/8/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 930 times | Debate No: | 60178 | ||
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)
 Pro R1: Greeting and definiton ONLY R2: Argument R3: Rebuttal R4: Comparing clashes Hi, i will be for the side that U.S. should keep meddling with Israel's affairs by giving them money and weapons to fight. Does anyone accept d challenge?  Con I accept this challenge and will argue in favor of the United States inhibiting foreign aid (weapons and finance) to Israel, at least for the time bering in regard to the current state of affairs. Thanks, Pro, and good luck. |
 |
|
Pro Palmo10 forfeited this round.
Con Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited the first round of this debate. I'll give him another round to post an argument. |
 |
|
Pro Agn so sry Con My opponent has chosen to forfeit this debate. Please vote for Con. Thank you. |
 |
|
Pro Palmo10 forfeited this round.
Con My opponent has chosen to forfeit this debate. Please vote for Con. Thank you. |
 |
Post a Comment
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Preston 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Preston 7 years ago
Report this Comment
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 7 years ago
| Palmo10 | Danielle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for the forfeits, and Pro conceded. Seems pretty obvious. What little S&G Pro gave was lacking, so I'm awarding that to Con as well. Sourcing never happened because the debate never really happened. Con, though--your rich text shows up HUGE, in case you didn't notice.
