The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

THBT there should be no gay marriage

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/23/2014 Category: People
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 879 times Debate No: 53165
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




I'm not doing this out of homophobia, but I just though of an argument yesterday, and I wanted to see if it was any good...


Firstly, gay (and lesbian) people have the right to get married because, quite frankly, they're humans too. If "straight" people are allowed to get married, so can gay people. If I put it out there plainly, marriage is not a religious ritual. Some might argue that marriage is an "institution ordained by God between a man and a woman" but there are plenty of atheists who get married. Neither is marriage a system to get children. Marriage is a legal contract. By denying gay people to get married, we are excluding them from our society. Yes, it is just a certificate, a little slip of paper that you could easily lose but to some gay people, it means the world to them so why not just let them get the marriage certificate they've wanted for so long? This would be a big step to gay people finally being able to fit into our society. Some politicians get all worked up and excited when it comes to racism and colour discrimination but if not allowing gay people to get married isn't discrimination, I don't know what is.
Debate Round No. 1


My proposal:

Currently, in 'marital' life a person can have 3 statuses. Married, single, or in a civil partnership (which before the laws were passed was legal for the LGBTQ community). The word 'marriage' started with only religious origins, and has begun to be recognised by the state- but it's not a matter of one size fits all. You need to have a religious marriage, and a civil marriage. I therefore suggest that we abolish the term marriage as a civil concept, and only have civil partnerships, to which all the benefits of marriage would accrue.

If the word marriage ceases to have any meaning, there will be no gay marriage which satisfies the resolution.

For the purposes of religion, let us assume that roughly 5% of the religious community says no to gay marriage. If, as Pro says YES, gay marriage all the time then that is infringing upon the rights of that community.

Thank you.


Your proposal of having a religious marriage and a civil marriage is extremely well thought-through and reasonable; however, you are not the commander of the universe, as in you are mostly powerless to do anything do change the marriage laws. This particular debate is about the existing marriage laws for gay peope and therefore although your point would be great in another situation, it is invalid here. Also, yes, a small perentage of the religious community says no to gay marriage. Regardless of how much that particular religious community is against gay marriage, it is wrong of them to impose their opinion on others. I, by no means am telling people that we should just ignore the group of people against gay marriage's opinion but other people shouldn't have to conform to their personal religious beliefs. History has proven time and time again that most traditional beliefs are wrong like children being seen and not heard and the people of the same gender being not allowed to get married is another one of them.

Debate Round No. 2


Thank you to my opponent for an engaging critique of this argument.

I will bear this in mind when I use it in a real debate.

Vote my opponent.


This was a fun debate to do and hope you win your debate.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Saska 6 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious choice.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.