The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

The Minimum Legal Drinking Age Should Be Lowered.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/2/2018 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 531 times Debate No: 109983
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




I think the MLDA (Minimum Legal Drinking Age) should not be reduced. In fact, I think it should be INCREASED to 25. As MNN says:' According to the latest research, the human brain does not fully develop until around age 25. '
As says: 'Reports in the 1970's showing that teenage car accidents increased in states where the MLDA had been lowered from 21...'



While there are statistical pros to increasing the drinking age, I think they are outweighed by the importance of freedom. Allowing people to make decisions, and even mistakes, is more important than statistical outcomes.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Vaarka 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: .

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.