The Theory of God
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
DeJesus.Lisette
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/24/2014 | Category: | Religion | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,001 times | Debate No: | 59493 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)
 Con 1. Must take the side of believing in god. 2. No curse words or direct attacks. 3. Must provide argument evidence with citation (of website) or chapter in book. Here is my opening statement: To my opinion the existence of god cannot be proved with real evidence. The nonexistent of god can, therefore it is more logical to not believe in the theory of god. I await your response.  Pro Yes, man's logic seems to better support the nonexistence of God (and not even to everyone on earth), but man"s limited world view, and natural imperfection, leaves room for a potential being that operates in ways that we just don"t understand, that are totally different from what we"ve deemed fact If you can accept that there may be things that don"t operate in accordance to man"s theoretical science, then you must accept the possibility of God"s existence. If God possibly exists, earthly logic doesn"t apply to him. So saying it's more logical to not believe in the theory of god than to believe in the theory of god is illogical |
 |
|
Con I never said scientific logic applies to everything there are some things that cannot be explained. Nobody knows everything. especially the huge things that are so complex. Which leads me to discuss my point. The majority of scientists do not believe in god. It has been proven that the more we advanced in technology and intelligence the less scientists believe in god. Another thing you said is god works in strange ways we cannot understand, well than how is it that the majority of Genesis describes what god is saying, BEFORE WE EXISTED. How did humans know what god said if he has never communicated with us? I await your reply. Bye (http://idpluspeterswilliams.blogspot.com...) Pro DeJesus.Lisette forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con Pro And i never said god works in strange ways |
 |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Eggsample 7 years ago
Report this Comment
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| I-AM-AWESOME | DeJesus.Lisette | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: |  | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 6 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF. Badd gramer. Pro failed to prove God exists; Pro's BOP is not just to prove possibility, but necessity (Con's positive atheistic beliefs are irrelevant to the resolution). Con had a source.
Vote Placed by Domr 7 years ago
| I-AM-AWESOME | DeJesus.Lisette | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con had BoP to show that god's "non-existence" can be proven. The only source given was a blog. No proof that he does NOT exist
