The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
3 Points

The U.S should continue to support other countries

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/11/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 642 times Debate No: 42187
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Should the U.S continue to support other countries, for now, no. We are in a hole ourselves so how is spending billions on countries who hate us benefit the U.S.


Hi, I accept. USA is a righteousness country. Helping others in need as a good humanitarian. USA is not only spending billions on countries who hate the US, it also spends billion of those who are "friendly" such as Haiti, Puerto Rico, Guam, Canada, Mexico, UK and Africa nations etc. I believe overspending is what causes USA to go into a "hole". Not supporting other nations. Therefore, I believe US should continue supporting other countries to a limit.
Debate Round No. 1


But when we do we lose alot, helping Vietnam for example and did George Washington say it wasn't right to involve ourselvs in public affairs? In the end we may be generous but we are to generous.


You can never be too generous. As Jesus said, we must give up our riches or help out that needs it. As you can see, Canada or UK. They support a lot and involve in public affairs. Also the nations in the Red Cross program. They help out as well .

Vietnam was one example of many services that the US has done. What about in Afghanistan. Or in South Korea. WW2.

USA is a great example of a helpful country. The only thing is bringing them down is overspending on oil. Especially that.

So therefore USA should continue to support other countries
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by GarretKadeDupre 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was more convincing, although I don't agree him. Con, more arguing, less questioning your own position next time xD