The Instigator
Con (against)
Anonymous
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
master-de-baiter
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

The US should ban all guns

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Anonymous
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/3/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 628 times Debate No: 112295
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Con

Pro starts
master-de-baiter

Pro

then how are we to protect ourselves from illegally bought guns large portion of shooting are illegally obtained. if all guns were banned then a shooter could shoot anywhere with out being scared of returned fire. Never mind the fact its a constitutional rights. I do think they could be stricter but not banned entirely
if I was a shooter I would go for places that gun free so I would get shoot back
Debate Round No. 1

Con

Yes, I agree with you. I am taking the con side and I am against the fact that the US should ban all guns
master-de-baiter

Pro

fuuuu
dont make a title then be against it, its confusing
Debate Round No. 2

Con

Sorry about that. I will make sure to not do that next time.
master-de-baiter

Pro

pro wins YOLO
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
On second thought, we should ban all guns, lets debate again
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
if you want to argue for being wrong
Posted by master-de-baiter 3 years ago
master-de-baiter
i CLEARLY had the better arguement
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
noob take the pro side
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by passwordstipulationssuck 3 years ago
passwordstipulationssuck
Anonymousmaster-de-baiterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides agreed on their position meaning that the con arguments stand.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
Anonymousmaster-de-baiterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both parties argued the Con position, making the case that self protection requires guns, so they shouldn't be banned.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.