The Instigator
Pro (for)
1 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

The United States should return to the Gold Standard:

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/12/2016 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 679 times Debate No: 91194
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




I accept. Since the BoP is on you, you can go first.

Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1


Thanks for making this debate! I'm sorry for responding so late. I have been busy with school. I also am doing this on a phone, so please pardon my spelling.

Rebuttals first:
1) The Constitution
The constitution was written over 200 years ago. At that time, when the global economy was much smaller then today's, it could be practical for a gold standard. However, as I will show, it is simply impractical for today's usage. Maybe then, when our economy was smaller, it was practical, but it isn't now.

2) The legality of us going off the standard.
Yes, I concede that legally, Nixon should not of taken us off the standard. However, that isn't an argument for us to go back to the gold standard. Nixon did this for a reason, and it helped.

3) Yes, while it is true that gold has more intrinsic value, that is only because we believe it does. A pound of dollars is more useful then a pound of gold as you can draw on them and use them to communicate. If we all of a sudden believed that gold was useless, then it would have little worth.

4) Prosperity
All I have to say is colleration is not causation. You can't prove that the economic prosperity was because of the gold standard. You also contradict yourself here. In reason 3, you state that if implemented, the gold standard would cause deflation. But here you say that, "They forget to include that deflation is a natural market fluctuation caused by competition and advancements in technology, which allows more goods to be produced at a lower price." So which is it?

5) Government Abuse
So? As you said, the governments can fix the price of their money. So why can't they do it to gold? If you are worrying about the government fixing the value of money, why can't they do it to gold?

6) Bubbles.
What is so bad about inflation? Low rates of inflation are signs of a good economy. To contrast, deflation is a sign of a weak economy.

7) Fraud
Yes, prisoners wouldn't trade money. But they wouldn't trade gold either. In a place like prison, where everything is controlled, obviously they would only trade things that were actually useful. The Coinage Act was written over 200 years ago. The gold standard might of worked then, but it won't now.

8) I really don't know what this is meant to mean.

9) Natural Selection.
Yes, back then, a man showing up with a bunch of gold would stop panic, but today, we simply don't have enough gold for that to me practical.

Now for my argument. It is short, but concise.

In short, the gold standard is a terrible idea due to inflexibility. When we pin the value of money to gold, everything depends on how much gold we have. If we have little gold, we will have to raise interest rates. Because central banks can't print more money when they need too, and our governments can't run deficits when they need too. This inflexibility can cause depressions as we can't get out of them easily if we get in them.

Although the idea is to limit inflation, the link I posted above shows that isn't the case, as our economy would depend completely on the amount of gold we have. That could be disastrous. For example, say another recession occurs, and people want their gold. If we don't enough gold, our economy could be in serious trouble.

So my arguments are not very long, but they are simple. Pinning our money to gold causes economic rigidness, which can slow growth and cause worsen depressions. Good luck!

Debate Round No. 2


Please extend you arguments next round, these were very short:


ConserativeDemocrat forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


Harrytruman wins by knockout!


Voters and HarryTruman; I am conceding this debate because I am no longer interested in continuing it. All I ask is that you give Truman the conduct point, and not all 7 points.
Sorry got accepting. Maybe we can debate in the future.
Debate Round No. 4


Democrat over here is just sore because he got beat, so yes, give me conduct, and arguments because I won.


Your arguments are weak. There is a reason why ZERO economists said we should return to the gold standard. You dropped my arguments, that's why I'm done. I trust them more then I trust you.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by ConserativeDemocrat 2 years ago
Ok, no worries.
Posted by harrytruman 2 years ago
I'm still working on my document, also, I forgot to put in that I will be using google documents, but that doesnt really affect anything anyway since it's not a breech in conduct.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: "Voters and HarryTruman; I am conceding this debate because I am no longer interested in continuing it. All I ask is that you give Truman the conduct point, and not all 7 points."