The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

The people on this site are hypocrites( excluding the arguing) they talk of ignorance on the christi

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/4/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 650 times Debate No: 56038
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




On the part of the Christians but they do not realize the logic and reason of the Catholics ( mainly) for example they say it is wrong ( in terms of A RELIGIOUS ARGUMENT) to assume that all that is unnatural is evil, is it not bad when a cow acts mad ( not in accordance to the cows nature ( unnatural)) or when a dog meows..what other evil is there besides that which is corrupt? I will be pointing out the ignorance sand general points of theological reasoning in order to show how flawed the viters are. Con will defend them. Hopefully after this argument the voters will not hate me, I would ask them to feel free to vote against me but PLEASE REFLECT ON HOW YOU ARGUE AND WUY YOU CRITICIZE!!!


People on here have more understanding than you give them credit for.
Perhaps your own opinions on theological events are making you feel superior to, "the common people".
Debate Round No. 1


I'm not saying I'm superior because of knowledge, I'm not saruman. People don't realize 1.) if you believe in a God that created the world, he is in every part of the world. When someone creates something it has a purpose. If god is superior and you realize that then you should just go with his will. Evil is a corruption of Good. The natural state is a good state. No one can be completely bad , people can only veer toward bad ideas( sinning) by commiting evil actions.


This debate is meaningless. You cannot generalize people.
By saying people don't understand something it is assumed you understand it fully, otherwise you wouldn't be judging their intelligence.

It is arrogance you are displaying.
Debate Round No. 2


If you would read my 1st round arguement I told you the reasons for doing this


Okay, so you want to talk about the misconceptions Protestants have on the Catholics?

Let's start another debate.

Voters, apologies, vote for Pro, since the whole purpose of this debate was unclear to me. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded debate in final round.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.