The Instigator
billsands
Pro (for)
The Contender
TheGreatGameLord
Con (against)

There is no point in discussing things anymore the time has come for action

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
TheGreatGameLord has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/26/2019 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 442 times Debate No: 121014
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (0)

 

billsands

Pro

People no longer listen to reason, The time now is to form armies and wipe out the enemy, We can nol onger disagree civilly the game is rigged the enemy is a liar and blind. . Victory or death!
TheGreatGameLord

Con

Action against who? Or what? Also, Why are we killing people? That solves nothing.
Debate Round No. 1
billsands

Pro

Exactly how did we win world war 2? Or the american revolution? We killed people
TheGreatGameLord

Con

Yeah, But we're not at war right now except for the War on Terror, And we're already killing people. So what exactly is your point? Who are we killing? Why is discussing not an option?
Debate Round No. 2
billsands

Pro

It is my desire we start killing each other, You know remove all the dead wood
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by screenjack 3 years ago
screenjack
All I'm saying is that this argument is so dangerously close to a call to action. Surely we can still be civil on a site were we test debate Ideas. I mean I've made some stupid claims but they're just claims. They can be true or false. So I've just got one question. We are talking about a hypothetical call to arms right? Nobody wants to target anybody because of ideas on a debate site. I'm pretty sure call to action is one of the few things the first amendment doesn't cover. I'm just saying.
Posted by melcharaz 3 years ago
melcharaz
are you metaphysically speaking of destroying evil? Its not possible for us to this, Evil will become more and more prevalent both in this time and the years to come. There are times when violence is needed to protect and defend belief and life. But other than that, It only serves to anger and cause pain.
Posted by Ku4nt3m 3 years ago
Ku4nt3m
@Smug_Tomato Oh, I think I can agree to that.
Posted by Smug_Tomato 3 years ago
Smug_Tomato
@Ku4nt3m
Violence is rarely justified.
Posted by Ku4nt3m 3 years ago
Ku4nt3m
@Smug_Tomato are you implying that violence is never justified?
Posted by Smug_Tomato 3 years ago
Smug_Tomato
If you have to resort to violence, You're reasoning is likely wrong.
Posted by billsands 3 years ago
billsands
we can talk about that over pistols at dawn
Posted by Sonofcharl 3 years ago
Sonofcharl
Perhaps your reasoning is wrong?
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.