There should not be Mandatory Vaccinations
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
ILUVROBLOX43
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 12/17/2017 | Category: | Science | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 564 times | Debate No: | 105916 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)
It is a HUGE SCAM by big Pharma. I don't care what anyone says!!!
The fact that vaccines cause autism is a fallacy and should not be treated as fact. I see that you are one of those people that believe that, unfortunately. Vaccines can be helpful for the body. They prevented smallpox, measles, and other dangerous diseases. I wonder what your counter-argument will be. |
![]() |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Emilrose 3 years ago
CatalyticConvertersRule | ILUVROBLOX43 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: This was a tough vote. Firstly, both opponents made sound, convincing arguments, secondly, I naturally have a pro-bias towards vaccines; what with having pre-existing knowledge on the benefits that society gains from them, and at what an advantage we are at *for* having them. Despite the extensive, voluminous argument put forward by Con, I will have to vote Pro. Their argument too was not without its flaws, but overall they were able to say: 'vaccines can be helpful for the body', and 'they prevented smallpox, measles and other dangerous diseases', which must've took a considerable amount of time and effort on their part. Con also failed to rebut these vastly impressive points, due to only selecting one round. It's rather regrettable that Con did do this, as I would've loved to have read this debate further and widened my knowledge/perspective with the arguments made by Con and Pro. This debate had the potential to be highly enlightening, but, I'll have to be satisfied with round one.
http://prn.fm...