This house believes that Sponge Bob Square Pants should lend his pants to Donald Duck
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 4/6/2008 | Category: | Entertainment | ||
Updated: | 14 years ago | Status: | Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,876 times | Debate No: | 3538 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (10)
Back in the good ol' days, we used to get aroused seeing just shoulders of another human being,and these whatchamacallits were only found, ya know, on thingymagigs. But it's absurd for lit'le lads, even of your modern age to see such sensual parts of the body on television.A good example is the fact that Donald Duck does not wear trousers, it is inhumane to show such pornography to those young minds. Children nowadays should just hang in the 'hood' or whatever. HOwever, since television is such an attraction ir is my idea that Spongebob Squarepants should give his pants to Donald Duck, it is more appropriate and much more preferable.
I challenge you younglings to contradict me. It will be very hard, ya know, especially as I've been around longer. ... Time for my nap time. Cheerios! zzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Thanks for hosting this debate, First I will rebutt your points and then move to mine. "A good example is the fact that Donald Duck does not wear trousers, it is inhumane to show such pornography to those young minds. Children nowadays should just hang in the 'hood' or whatever. " Donald Duck wear's a t-shirt which almost comes down to cover his bottoms but anyway, he's a duck so he doesn't need any shorts. What the children see is white duck hair which is like the rest of his body and children that age that watch those shows are content with that image. "HOwever, since television is such an attraction ir is my idea that Spongebob Squarepants should give his pants to Donald Duck, it is more appropriate and much more preferable." Suppose that SS gave his pants to Donald Duck, then wouldn't Spongebob be showing his sensual parts? Now to move to mine, If Spongebob gives up his pants he will be showing some sensual parts that children should not see. Donald Duck doesn't need pants because he has a long t-shirt and the TV doesn't even show anything there. |
![]() |
Firstly, Donald Duck does not wear a shirt that goes over his gluteus maximus. It is therefore inappropriate, as it is no different from porn. This is duck porn shown on children's television, is this justifiable? To filter such vulgar and mature thoughts into their premature minds? That is taking away the children's rights to a naive and innocent childhood, to not be bombarded by temptation and pressure from society and brainwashed by the media.
As for how Spongebob would have no pants when it is lent: Spongebob Square pants is significant for owning his pants. The telivision show is BASED on his pants, so without it, the show is basically not going to run. Ergo, without his pants, Spongebob is not going to be on TV, be broadcasting his sensual parts on children's TV. This is acceptable. Besides, Spongebob, according to episode 12, has more than one pair of pants in his wardrobe. go suck on that youngling. time for my afternoon brunch. Godspeed!
First to refute; "Firstly, Donald Duck does not wear a shirt that goes over his gluteus maximus. It is therefore inappropriate, as it is no different from porn. This is duck porn shown on children's television, is this justifiable? To filter such vulgar and mature thoughts into their premature minds? That is taking away the children's rights to a naive and innocent childhood, to not be bombarded by temptation and pressure from society and brainwashed by the media." His shirt does cover his private parts and have you asked one kid that watches that show what he/she thinks about his clothing choices? "As for how Spongebob would have no pants when it is lent: Spongebob Square pants is significant for owning his pants. The telivision show is BASED on his pants, so without it, the show is basically not going to run. Ergo, without his pants, Spongebob is not going to be on TV, be broadcasting his sensual parts on children's TV. This is acceptable. Besides, Spongebob, according to episode 12, has more than one pair of pants in his wardrobe. " Spongebob would still be showing even if he had jeans or pants instead of shorts so that is irrelevant. How do you know Donald Duck doesn't have longer t-shirts as spongebob has more shorts? "go suck on that youngling. time for my afternoon brunch. Godspeed!" How do you know how old I am. for all you know I could be 99 so your the youngling...... and how much do you eat? |
![]() |
debatinator forfeited this round.
Obviously my opponent has nothing to say on this matter so therefore I should win this debate. THanks, |
![]() |
Post a Comment
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by padfo0t 13 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by tyion 14 years ago

Report this Comment
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by crazypenguin 13 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by sagarous 13 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by burningpuppies101 13 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by padfo0t 13 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Rousseau 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by HoosierPapi 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by GaryBacon 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by left_wing_mormon 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Spiral 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by SportsGuru 14 years ago
debatinator | crazypenguin | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |