The Instigator
Flatstanley
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Slav_ka
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Tim coob

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Slav_ka
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/3/2018 Category: Education
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 226 times Debate No: 106355
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Flatstanley

Pro

Wen th Sun shine on Erth 2 Tim point r creetd on oposit side ov Ert nown as miday an midnit. Waer th 2 majr tim forcs join synrgy creetates 2 new minr Tim point we reconize as Sonup an Sondown. The 4 equidistant tim point cn b cinsidrd as Tim Squar imprntd on the sircl ov erf. In 1 rowtatin ov th erf sfeer eech Tim cornr point rowtats throo th othr 3 cornr tim point thus creeting 16 cornrs 96 ours an 4 simltanous 24 our Days wit in 1 rowtatin ov erf equatd 2 a Higher Order ov life tim coob
Slav_ka

Con

'Wen th Sun shine on Erth 2 Tim point r creetd on oposit side ov Ert nown as miday an midnit. Waer th 2 majr tim forcs join synrgy creetates 2 new minr Tim point we reconize as Sonup an Sondown. The 4 equidistant tim point cn b cinsidrd as Tim Squar imprntd on the sircl ov erf. In 1 rowtatin ov th erf sfeer eech Tim cornr point rowtats throo th othr 3 cornr tim point thus creeting 16 cornrs 96 ours an 4 simltanous 24 our Days wit in 1 rowtatin ov erf equatd 2 a Higher Order ov life tim coob.'

No.
Debate Round No. 1
Flatstanley

Pro

Haha that es no good aguming i gess I to smort 4 u u canot compreehend me haha
Slav_ka

Con

Rebuttals:

Pro claims that he/she is too 'smort' for me to 'compreheehend' him/her, however, as Pro isn't even able to spell 'smart' and 'comprehend' properly or structure his/her sentences correctly; one very easily establishes that he/she is not smart at all. In fact, pros case is incomprehensible, not comprehensible. If Pro is so passionate about Tim Coob, he/she should've defined the terms of this debate and expounded on the resolution; in addition to presenting better arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Flatstanley

Pro

That dos nt hav any thig 2 do wif th gr8 tim coob plees take ths serius
Slav_ka

Con

It has everything to do with Tim Coob. Seeing as Con has dropped all of my points and failed to make any intelligible ones of his/her own, vote CON.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Flatstanley 9 months ago
Flatstanley
I think flatstanly es winer cheeken dinr
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by SupaDudz 9 months ago
SupaDudz
FlatstanleySlav_kaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: By default because CON attempts to make an argument while PRO is just, idk. Con gets grammar too