The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

True or false?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/9/2018 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 705 times Debate No: 118508
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (10)
Votes (1)



Awarness is rooted in power, Awarness is power, So by default i think i am all powerfull, And have to learn that i have limits


I thank Pro for this opportunity.


Typically, The BOP (Burden of Proof) either rests on the instigator of the debate or the one holding the Pro position. [1] Typical debate etiquitte says that whoever brings up the BOP first can dictate it. [1] Both of these pieces of information are true according to the creator of Debate. Org. Thus, I assign the BOP to Pro.


The difficulty with this is that I cannot tell what Pro is trying to prove. The resolution is "True or False", Which is already vague, But his argument is completely unrelated to that. This should already be a reason to vote Con. Besides that, Let's analyze the arguments:

"Awarness is rooted in power"

This is an unclear assertion backed up by zero evidence or reasoning.

"Awarness is power"

It's illogical that something could be rooted in something (which implies difference) and be the same thing at the same time.

"So by default i think i am all powerfull, "

Since I have already disproved both of the premises that lead him to this conclusion, This is also false.

" And have to learn that i have limits"

This is a contradiction. If you have to learn your limits, You are not all powerful.


Pro's argument does not make a semblance of sense, So you should award arguments to me. He also makes over 5 spelling and grammar mistakes which may contribute to the nonsensical nature of his argument, So you should also award me the points for spelling and grammar.

I once again thank Pro for this debate.

Vote Con.


[1] https://www. Debate. Org/forums/debate. Org/topic/56116/
Debate Round No. 1
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
If you grab a babys throat, It will grab you and try to remove your hands
Posted by mosc 3 years ago
false. Awareness shares a direct connection to the rational mind. A baby by definition lacks awareness. Why? B/c its mind has not matured and developed.
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
No, Its because con can not use logic to pierce through Vi's wall of ignorance.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
Cuz he would lose
Posted by Our_Boat_is_Right 3 years ago
If con had knew that pro lives in his own reality, He would not have accepted this debate.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
It might be because i left out the key part

Awarness=a war energy
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
It was as enlightened as the Mariana Trench.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
Perhaps this went over your heads
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
He is not aware of what he speaks
Posted by PointProven 3 years ago
What does that mean?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hayd 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments were unclear, cryptic, and enigmatic. Con presented argument following a pattern of logic. Con had more convincing arguments.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.