The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)


Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
simtuzi has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 11/22/2017 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 349 times Debate No: 105240
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




It seems to me, that in this dysphoric democracy, (officially a republic), what had always been "up" is now "down" and visa versa. If you think society/the global collective has made 1 inch of progress in the last 100 years, this is your debate... Make the case for moral subjectivity or progressivism. (Which I think are basically interchangeable.)


Well I argue that society as whole is progressed atleast 1 inch from the year 1917.

My first point would be internet. We can converse stuff like this, which would be otherwise extremely hard as I probably don't live anywhere near where you are or the readers of this post are. So for having an some form of conversation is atleast a step on road of progression.

I could point many ways how technology has helped to reduce mortality (accessibility of good drinking water, healthcare treatments like penicillin, and so forth) but you must have some spesific intentions on your mind to start debate like this, don't you?

Well how about world literature rate? better than ever! also we have an better access to that literature. How about great scientist like Einstein?

I'm not arguing that world is better from the dawn of time, but from the year 1917. Which was time of terrible world war just as in the same time the spanish flu was raving.

On politics and humanity I'm agreeing that we are not that different maybe even some setbacks happened! But with great inventions like electric drill, internet and so forth the whole humanity is progressed from the year 1917 that 1 inch.

So basically what I'm saying that changes for dying horrible death in war or plague is plundered. Also Infant deaths are going down so there is higher change to be born too.

but tell me what you have in mind,

regards challenger.
Debate Round No. 1


Well... Perhaps we don't disagree as much as I'd hoped my challenger would... The topic is hopefully the subjectivity vs. objectivity of truth, in which case, you would argue subjective. However I would also willingly argue against the progressive philosophy. Your thinking society's technological advancements have not just made us more stupid and slothful than we otherwise would be, but have increased our quality of life by at least one inch, only qualifies you to be the challenger.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Simple_Logic 2 years ago
The only truth is logic
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.