We should not protect the environment
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 1/1/2019 | Category: | Science | ||
| Updated: | 2 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 803 times | Debate No: | 119696 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)
 Con Let's see what the Con side will say.  Pro "We should protect the environment because humanity is responsible for that. " are we though? Should the environment be placed over the well-being of the people? "We should love our home - the beautiful planet. " First we need to put the people above the environment, I am guessing that you want to shut down oil and coal plants and replace them with solar and wind power plants, But the thing is that we will go into a energy crises and many people will be without power, As well as the fact that many people will lose there jobs, We should always put the people above anything else, We can't ruin peoples lives for the environment. |
 |
|
Con Let us just say that I am not wanting to stop electricity. What about smokimg? And can we decrease the amount of rubbish? We can also slow down the greenhouse effects. Well, You said you do not want people to lose jobs. But if the environment turns worse we are not going to have a good life. Our planet being to warm will melt ice in Arctic and the sea level will rise, Destroying our land. Do you want dooms day or people losing jobs? Pro Soviet4life forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con Pro Soviet4life forfeited this round. |
 |
Post a Comment
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by kathy_debater 2 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Soviet4life 2 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by LOL98700z 2 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Soviet4life 2 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by LOL98700z 2 years ago
Report this Comment
No votes have been placed for this debate.
