Why does the god of the terrorizer bible make it so foolishly easy for murder to occur?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
chrmon2
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 12/24/2018 | Category: | Religion | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 389 times | Debate No: | 119604 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)
Naturally because I have a conscience and the god of the bible clearly does not, I am taking the con side on this argument.
In the horrific plague that is the bible, Its god has murdered 2, 821, 364 in one little splatch of land which includes babies, Children and pregnant women (abortions in which chirstians are so against. But how can they be considering that their god has knowingly committed them? So that's just a bit of a tad of a contradiction in which christians have bellies full. ) So this so-called god, In which nobody has ever been able to prove exists, Doesn't really care about murder one god damned inkling of a little bit. Since this murdering that its god doesn't care about, Well gosh yah doormat brain reading this, Don't yah think that type of thinking, Rationalizing, Reasoning, Common sense, Logic in which there is obviously none IS NOT somehow going to splash on over to man so that man IS NOT going to be duplicating this wonderous family dinner accomplishment in which this god of the bible ordered its subjects/ chosen people to commit bulldozer genocide after genocide which after all IS MURDER because this so-called crybaby god was meager, Burping, Playduh, A windup battery operated tinker toy, Petty and jealous in which no supreme deity/ god ever would be? Better yet, Simply look to its great flood legend (which never happened btw) as its storybook god character murdered every single man, Woman, And child (babies included) showing how this god character is completely immoral. What a truly great bank roll role model this god character of the bible is. Right? Here is a link to show all of god's murders. https://dwindlinginunbelief. Blogspot. Com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible. Html RULES FOR THIS DEBATE: Prove that the god of the bible is peaceful, Kind, Caring, Loving, Harmonious and not a warlike genocidal maniac. Christ/ jesus does not come into play as there's no proof for his existence and if so, He was the false messiah. dsjpk5 will NOT be allowed to vote in the voting process.
https://www. Debate. Org/debates/Why-does-the-god-of-the-bible-murder-babies-children-and-pregnant-mothers/1/ |
![]() |
Sorry snookums 15 year old still teeny bopper stuck in high school with a lower than a high school rain dent edumacation, Cabbage meat batbrain stuffed in nuclear waste dimwitted dullard sore poverty sap snot meat sow, Yah haven't won anything. You in being as completely immoral as you are, Just like your fake and fraudulent god, Are not worth even a squabble of ignorant barf of scrotum from your reareth endeth scalp. That was made perfectly clear unto you in the debate in which after you proved you were immoral. If you don't understand simpleton se' habla' Ingles, That's not my problem smarty, That's yours.
Well I already won this and my opponent is a troll. Vote for me! |
![]() |
backwardseden forfeited this round.
chrmon2 forfeited this round. |
![]() |
backwardseden forfeited this round.
chrmon2 forfeited this round. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by MaleficentMatador 3 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by chrmon2 3 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by whirledpeas 3 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by jrardin12 3 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by jrardin12 3 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by jrardin12 3 years ago

Report this Comment
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
backwardseden | chrmon2 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff half of the rounds. That's poor conduct.
Vote Placed by zhaod1 3 years ago
backwardseden | chrmon2 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Of Course Con's conduct is horrible. Also, Pro already had an argument from an earlier debate, which Con basically didn't rebut at all, only uttering insults at Pro.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
backwardseden | chrmon2 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was the only won who gave an argument.