The Instigator

Pro (for)

Losing

0 Points

The Contender

Con (against)

Winning

8 Points

Why we should't wear mufti to schools

Do you like this debate?No Yes+0

Post Voting Period

The voting period for this debate has ended.

after 2 votes the winner is...

9spaceking

Debate Rounds (3)

Comments (1)

Votes (2)

Pro Wearing mufti to school stops gold coin donations. If we had mufti days, everyone would have to bring a gold coin for charity or something. If we had schools wearing mufti, there would be hardly any donations per year. Gold coin donations can help your community and some poor countries who had an natural disaster. Wearing mufti everyday, no money is donated to charity AT ALL. Report this Argument Con Mufti: plain clothes worn by a person who wears a uniform for their job, such as a soldier or police officer. See: https://www.google.com... Therefore my opponent's arguments are incoherent and make no sense. Gold coin donations are irrelevant to school uniforms. Uniforms bring a sense of unity and discipline. It works well in the military and bullies cannot bully you on what you wear because they are wearing the same exact thing. Report this Argument
Pro School uniforms are expensive to buy. Most of the time, they charge you more than what they pay for the uniforms to be manufactured. often there is a summer uniform and a winter uniform. On average, uniforms cost $250 or more per child. Report this Argument Con Normal clothing can cost up to an average of almost 73 *12 = 876 per person Source: http://www.loweryourspending.com... 876>250. Argument refuted. Report this Argument
Pro 371761 forfeited this round. Con Vote me. Report this Argument

1 comment has been posted on this debate.

Posted by Ja50n 7 years ago

First of all you have to define mufti, because others may not know what mufti is.

2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.

Vote Placed by Cold-Mind 7 years ago

	371761	9spaceking	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-	-		0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-	-		0 points
Who had better conduct:	-		-	1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-		1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-		2 points
Total points awarded:	0	4

Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument remained unrefuted. Pro forfeited.

Vote Placed by distraff 7 years ago

	371761	9spaceking	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:		-	-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:		-	-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-		-	1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-		1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-		2 points
Total points awarded:	0	4

Reasons for voting decision: Cons arguments about bullying were convincing. Pro forfeited.

Big Issues