The Instigator
Mharman
Pro (for)
The Contender
shannon83
Con (against)

Wikipedia Ought to Considered a Reliable Source

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Mharman has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/5/2017 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 930 times Debate No: 102348
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (14)
Votes (0)

 

Mharman

Pro

I will be arguing that Wikipedia should be considered a reliable source.

Round 1 is acceptance.
Round 2 we present our arguments.
Round 3 we rebut our opponent's Round 1 arguments.
Round 4 we rebut our opponent's Round 2 arguments.
shannon83

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for this opportunity.
I will be arguing that Wikipedia should not be considered a reliable source.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Mharman 2 years ago
Mharman
We'll have to do an entirely new debate.
Posted by shannon83 2 years ago
shannon83
We can continue I will just not comment on one on the rebuttal rounds.
Posted by Mharman 2 years ago
Mharman
I'll see if we can try this again later.
Posted by Mharman 2 years ago
Mharman
Shoot. I'm sorry.
Posted by Mharman 2 years ago
Mharman
Shoot. I'm sorry.
Posted by Mharman 2 years ago
Mharman
Shoot. I'm sorry.
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 2 years ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
Really?

Sometimes, Wikipedia can't really be trusted!
Posted by RR-MKIV 2 years ago
RR-MKIV
I think we all need to keep one thing in mind. While Wikipedia can be altered at a moments notice, there is also a bibliography down near the bottom of each file most of the time. The only time I use Wikipedia is to access these, which are often good resources. Its a matter of discretion and personal intelligence.
Posted by logicinlife 2 years ago
logicinlife
I had a debate on the same subject. I look forward to yalls approach to it!
Posted by shannon83 2 years ago
shannon83
I would debate you on this though the page says: You cannot accept this challenge because you do not match the Instigator's age and/or rank criteria.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.