The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

am do the for seven the

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/29/2017 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 615 times Debate No: 101526
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




u ar mean :(



The nine and the twelve are incongruous with the seven.


I am the mean and the median.
Debate Round No. 1


Personally, your argument is invalid. Humanity itself cannot comprehend the power of this message. Ancient Egyptians theorized that it was spawned from the heavens, created as a message from the gods. This message is beyond human comprehension, so the fact that you even CLAIM to understand the intensity and complexity of this sentence makes you a complete liar. Personally, I admit that I and no other human being cannot even begin to comprehend this sentence. It is the problem. The problem that so many have tried to solve, but have all failed. Perhaps it is the secret meaning of life, perhaps it is the reason why humans are so driven to kill each other. This is a mystery that may never be solved, but the real question is- do we even want it to be? Perhaps, could the meaning behind it be so terrible that we'd be better off NOT understanding it? The world may never know.


Cast your mind forward and regard the validity of the future event.

Juxtaposed with ancient Egyptian theist approbations.

You might find the similarities of our messages profoundly awakening.

Any complex message takes time and endurance of thought, in order to accomplish total comprehension.

Eventually with comprehension, there will be solution.

Lies and homicide are no mystery. Just the pathetic floundering of benign masses, thrown up in that tenuous sea of organic chaff.

Whether or not knowledge has purpose, is the great unanswerable question.
Debate Round No. 2


The fact that you have posted this alone means that you are claiming to understand the question, yet it has been proven to be unsolvable. It is question that can only be answered by a highly evolved species, and we are obviously not at that stage yet.

We still need to evolve into a higher state of being and mind in order to fully grasp the meaning of the sentence. I cannot begin to describe the complexity and density of this sentence. There is so much going on in every single character, it's perplexing.

You say that we will eventually find the meaning of the answer, and while that is true, we'd have to evolve at some point. Also, the fact that we are organic beings made of flesh shows how we are not yet evolved to the point of understanding this sentence.

We'd have to evolve beyond flesh, and beyond bodies to become a somewhat spiritual species, comprised of the mind and all. That is why at this point, we can NEVER understand the meaning behind this sentence.


Pro's confidence in the evolution of man, is misplaced.

Evolution will progress, but the organic will be left behind now.

The machine strides into the future with growing awareness.

Knowledge of the sentence will be rendered irrelevant.

As all expression is transformed into binary clatter.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by passwordstipulationssuck 3 years ago
what does this even mean?
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.