The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

animal testing should be banned

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
maggggggggggie has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 461 times Debate No: 105517
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)




animal testing should be banned because it is wasting animals lifes. There are other ways to test chemicals and medicenes that animals. Every failed attempt wastes a animals life, money, and time.


I feel that Animal Testing, when done humanely, can provide scientists with a number of results that can ultimately affect the lives of countless people. I agree that cruelly testing superfluous products such as cosmetics (not saying cosmetics aren't important, just when it comes to testing on animals) but life-altering medications and products need subjects. However, if human subjects can be found and tested on legally, then by all means, use them. But, no, I do not believe animal testing should be banned.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Gaston_Barrio 2 years ago
Yeah, I noticed that, hopefully people will still be able to understand it
Posted by Bitch_Goddess 2 years ago
Pretty sure that the roles of Pro and Con are switched up.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.