The Contender
Pro (for)
Anonymous
child labor good? it is
Debate Round Forfeited
kyle3.0 has forfeited round #4.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 2/21/2018 | Category: | People | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Debating Period | ||
Viewed: | 488 times | Debate No: | 108336 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)
child labor is good because it means you dont have to do anything and can be lazy. they bring money and you dont evn have to get your hands dirty
so boom Pro Children work long hours, often exposed to hazardous chemicals and made to use dangerous tools and machinery that are inappropriate to their mental and physical development. Its so widespread. Child labour in agriculture is not just in the developing world; it even exists in the United States and Europe. In most countries children assist their families in small scale fishing, family farms and subsistence agriculture. Girls are often kept away from school to work as domestics. Because it's often hidden or invisible. This is the case of domestics working outside their own home. The children - almost always girls - work very long hours, have no chance to go to school, and are isolated from family and friends. Often they are treated like slaves and sexually and physically abused. Many girls living in agricultural communities drop out of school to work as domestics in their villages or the nearby towns. Some children are forced to work in debt-bondage. In return for a money advance or credit, a person offers their labour, or that of a child, for an indefinite period. Sometimes only the child is pledged, becoming a commodity in the process. This form of slavery can continue through generations. This happens a lot in agricultural communities. |
![]() |
its good because children children can get money get money and learn about how hard life is
Pro "learn about how hard life is" There is a time when children will have to learn about the realities of life but it is not in their earlier years. Since you haven"t specified what ages of child labour will be implemented for I will define child as anyone under the age of 18. Does a 10 year old need to learn the harsh realities of life. At that age children are emotionally unstable and telling them about the realities of life will not be good for their well being, especially not through work. I also notice you have neglected to respond to any of my arguments so I"ll just put this little reminder for you. |
![]() |
ok but it is better to learn about life that why it is not as hard in the future so when they get a job and they hit rock bottom and they know what to do so ha
Pro |
![]() |
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Anonymous 3 years ago

Report this Comment
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.