druken shood be good en world me ladeeh
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
FuzzyCatPotato
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/3/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 888 times | Debate No: | 59919 | ||
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)
 Pro rooles: 1. fack oof con 2. noo bein a wee prick  Con --- Worldwide Drunkenness is Bad Pro is basically asserting that the entire world should be drunk (at least once and simultaneously). This would cause: 1: Alcholics to break abstinence and re-become alcoholics, damaging their lives. 2: Pregnant women to increase the liklihood of (a) a complication in her pregnancy, (b) a birth defect, and (c) Fetal Alcoholism Syndrome. 3: Drivers to crash, including soccer moms, freighter truck drivers, cruise ship captains, passenger plane pilots, passenger train conductors, and nuclear sub captains. 4: Greater amounts of liver disease. 5: Emergency room operators to be unable to operate and people (who will be spilling into emergency rooms after the aforementioned) to suffer and/or die. In addition, I don't recommend allowing a bear to f*** you, or anyone else, up the a**, or anywhere else. Bears are dangerous, especially if you are drunk, and even more if both you and the bear are drunk. --- RFD Summary: Conduct: Clear Con vote. Pro cursed, Con did not. Furthermore, 1 round debates are terrible. Grammar: Clear Con vote. Fer Crissake, LOEK aht eet! Arguments: Clear Con vote. Pro had no arguments and had the BOP, while Con raised 5 points against world drunkenness. Sources: No vote. None used. |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| J03ybatts | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better arguments.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
| J03ybatts | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: pro did nothing
Vote Placed by SocialistAtheistNutjob 7 years ago
| J03ybatts | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro cursed on many occasions
Grammar: Pro's grammar hurt to read
Arguments: Con successfully refutes the claims made by Pro
