gay marriage
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
TheMoralCompass2014
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/15/2014 | Category: | People | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,592 times | Debate No: | 58972 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (14)
Votes (1)
 Pro Let's put what you said in perspective, shall we. Homosexuality was considered a mental illness. Black people were considered 3/5 of a person who couldn't own anything. Women were considered less than men. Autism was considered an untreatable mental retardation. It was thought that women determined the sex of a child.... that was disproved by science btw. The list goes on and do you know why? Because things change and life goes on. If you believe so much in the ideas of the past why don't you drink some monkey brain phosphorus to get smarter so you can better push your point.  Con http://homosexualityandscience.wordpress.com... http://www.behaviorismandmentalhealth.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... https://socialcosmos.library.uu.nl... |
 |
|
Pro DuhTruth forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
|
Pro I did, however, look at your comments. You compaired homosexuals to pedifiles. People can not marry children because marrige should be between two consinting adults. Pedifiles wouldn't want to marry a child because children will grow up. Furthermore, any laws against pedifiels are not there because pedifiles are 'sexual deviants.' They are there to pretect children. Who is being protected with samesex marrige laws. You also said that homosexuals would have been eliminated if they were born that way, wrong. Have you ever heard of a resesive trait. That meens one can cary a trait and not show sighns of it via a herosexual can have a homosexual child. DUH Con |
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 7 years ago
| DuhTruth | TheMoralCompass2014 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: *scratches his head* So, the topic was gay marriage. Pro uses this debate to discuss what he finds wrong with Con's views on gay people... Something's missing here. I don't even see any actual arguments except an assertion based on false analogies that just doesn't hold up in the slightest. I get where you're going with it, but the lack of warrants, links and analysis just makes it moot. Con never argued the resolution either, but since it's Pro's burden to actually follow the resolution he made, he loses the debate. He also loses a conduct point due to the forfeit. I don't agree with Con's arguments either, and there are a bunch of simple ways to disparage his sources (and since his links don't support the res, he's not getting sources), but without seeing those arguments, I have no choice but to side with the uncontested points of Con.
No matter how much you jam your fingers in your ears and yell, "la la la la la", you cannot pray the gay away. Despite mountains of undisputed evidence your only claim is about anuses, which I would anticipate someone half my age should be able to understand is stupid and fallacious, let alone someone approaching double my age.
Is it possible that you're projecting, and are, in fact, yourself gay?
You will win this debate just because Pro is not able to fulfill his burden.
[http://www.debate.org...]