Global Warming Exists

For my opening statement/introduction, I will continue by defining the main topic, global warming.

"Global Warming": Is the dramatic increase in global temperature in both the air and ocean.

Global warming is caused by the excessive release of co2 (carbon dioxide) into the air. These released amounts of carbon dioxide gather in the ozone layer, which is supposed to protect the world from the sun's dangerous ultra violent rays. When the co2 is in the ozone layer, instead of defending the world from the heat, it absorbs it. This is where "global warming" comes from. It literally is like it sounds. When this heat is in the ozone, it causes serious climatic changes in many regions through out the world.

One of the issues that attracts most of the world is the rapid melting of the ice caps located in the Antarctic region. When the ice caps melt, it adds to the oceans around the world. This rapid increase of water amount can lead to flooding and the disruption of the North Atlantic Current. This also contributes to climate changes. Flooding would have to attain most of the world's attention. This is primarily due to major cities that lie on the coasts of regions. An example of why this issue is most important is the fact that one of the last pieces that broke off the ice caps was about the size of Rhode Island. I would ask viewers to think of the amount of water that is and image how much exactly that adds to the ocean.

For the voters' concerns...I will post links that consist of information about global warming:

http://www.epa.gov...
http://www.globalwarming.org...
http://topics.nytimes.com...#
http://en.wikipedia.org...

Now please if my opponent would be so kind and proceed with his/her opening statement and state his/her reasoning....
Thank you!

Well my opponent is certainly not the type to go out on a limb but let's give him a little more mixed metaphor and a little more rope anyway.

http://www.finitesite.com...

None of the above is an argument so no need to dissect it.

We are just in the process of negotiating a fair debate topic. That is all I ask.

Well, my opponent has asked that we negotiate a more specific and fair topic but since I have no way of contacting him at the time, I cannot make any further arguments. I just would like it if both sides were capable of giving descent arguments and having a fair position for or against a topic that is a little less broad. So I stand my ground.

OK we're on. Global warming exists and at least world leaders are aware of the problem and are holding conferences and meetings to try and solve it.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch exists and world leaders are not aware of the problem and nobody has come up with any reasonable way to cope with the situation except to make it worse.

http://www.naturalnews.com...

The negative has not yet stated enough evidence for me to make any opposing arguments. So I argue the same facts I have in the previous arguments.

Therefore, I rest my case....

My opponent has not yet stated enough evidence for me to make any opposing arguments.
Simply pointing to the library and saying "it's all there" is not evidence.
Preferable would be at least an absract of an article from a peer-reviewed journal in the subject.
My opponent has failed to even acknowledge the existence of my first-round YouTube post which remains the only evidence submitted so far.