The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

god according to the bible would ---not--- use text as a form of communication

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
nicholastillar has forfeited round #1.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/18/2018 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 267 times Debate No: 106837
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (8)
Votes (0)




god according to the bible would ---not--- use text as a form of communication, the worst possible form of communication to god. "Christians don't understand the character of God" 6:45 or watch the entire thing. Atheist Experience 21.49 with Tracie Harris and Don Baker. Call starts at approx 47:30. Picks up after a long introduction 54:45 and really gets into it 1:03:30 - 1:11:30. Pay attention everybody to vidie #2 and how YOU as a christian can easily misinterpret YOUR bible which is one of the reasons why YOUR god would --- NEVER --- use text as a form of communication. Don Baker, one of the hosts here in the vidie also briefly mentions it. And he's 100% correct!

For this debate it will be up to you as Con to prove that god according to the bible would use text, namely the bible, as a form of communication. You must also give the "why" this god would choose text as a form of communication. For extra credit, prove that this god would use text as a form of communication above all else.

dsjpk5will not be allowed to vote in the voting process.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
Yeah you the truly pathetic piece of s--t that you are tries to justify slavery and rape as only goodie two-shoes christians can. And its a very small tinkling ammout of you.
Oh and oh yeah you didn't pay attention to the Aron Ra Dillihunty video did you? Nope. Because they are correct...
"If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors" how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can"t distinguish between the law of Israel and god"s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take figuratively. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn"t make any sense. It doesn"t matter how its translated. It doesn"t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well." Aron Ra
Actually it wouldn"t be written at all. What"s wrong with your god comin" down and talking to people? "Hey you know some of that stuff that"s in the book? I"m here to correct it." Matt Dillahunty

Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
@ANANIGMA - See? That's why you'd be separated from the sheep and the cattle and the herd of the greater wrong of the right. Can't you read? Apparently not. Exodus 21 IS ABSOLUTELY god based on slavery especially 21: 20-21. And NO ONE of merit would EVER agree with a minced mutton membrane mechanical mind like you who in turn does know one helluva lot more than you EVER will about your pathetic swamp flu religion. Just because you are so entrenched and detained and you have to go into absolute flat out denial and Matt happens to be absolutely 100% correct and so does Aron Ra and thus proving your entire christian religion false, that's not my problem lovey dovey, that's yours. Now you go back and you have a nice big fat look at the entire chapter again especially those verses. Oh and oh yeah, the ENTIRE atheist community is banded together on that one. And you as usual, are out on your own with 0% proof of one god damned thing except for where to throw a Frisbee into a pile of manure spread.
And ah yes, it is in your sick christian laws that you praise owning a person and personal property and well as you praise rape.
And again YOUR god could have started out with peace, love, kindness, harmony, care for each other etc etc etc. Nah he chose hate, evil, pain, anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, killing, bloodshed, war/ genocide(s), suffering, jealousy, fury,... jealousy tisk tisk is something that you will never be able to float that one by which only shows YOUR god's utter imperfection.
And here's a REAL humdinger... Its estimated that there are roughly 125 billion galaxies in this universe. At the center of each galaxy is a black hole. Wow. Your god has created more black holes - nothingness - big blank holes in the universe - that he has human souls that has EVER walked this planet. So your god cares more for black holes - nothingness- than he does human souls. Kinda tell the universe about YOUR god in which YOU cannot even prove exists. Pathetic.
Posted by ANANIGMA 3 years ago
Sorry but the Dillahunty and Arron Ra video was lie after lie. Exodus 21 says nothing about GOD endorsing slavery, actually it says you are to FREE your SERVANT if you choose to purchase one. Exodus 21:2 says "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing." When rape is brought up, again it's not endorsed but dealt with as a law. It would be like saying our Justice system endorses rape cause we have laws that enforce penalties on those who choose to rape. Duet 22:28-29. These guys have NEVER read the bible, they have made a name parroting verses that have been taken out of context for centuries.
Posted by MRAAJ.evil 3 years ago
BEG blatant BEG nullins
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 3 years ago
@dsjpk5 can you vote for me in the debate with J-A-Moore, please?

Here's the link:
Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
@dsjpk5 - You don't have the guts to apologize to me or anyone for your built in nazism and sadistic stalking of me or others as you surely do, so who wants to have a barbie and ken raggedy ann anything to do with you? Gosh!
Posted by dsjpk5 3 years ago
If you have any guts, you'll let me debate you on this.
Posted by Pill_Junkie_Monkey 3 years ago
Gods not real, who cares?
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.