is debate. Org really a symposium of intelligent minds?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
LOL98700z
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 1/17/2019 | Category: | Funny | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 793 times | Debate No: | 119946 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (1)
First round for acceptance
I accept your argument. I do think that many in debate. Org are intelligent while some are indeed trolling. |
![]() |
Is anything on the internet really meant for intelligent minds? Trolling is common as well as stupid cat memes and stupid memes in general. Why should debate. Org be any different?
Obviously, From my opponent's pervious debate of why is earth flat, He had admitted himself to be a total troll. I will disregard that comment and try to convince why is Debate. Org not a place for trolls. The majority of us who had joined the Debate. Org is serious in participating in debate. Despite my personal religious affiliation and people such as backwardseden and Omar2345's atheist standing. I must argue that they are intelligent and smart. Their use of language is amazing and beautiful. There is a whole lot to be learned from them. To be honest, The internet is toxic due to the influence of trolls such as yourself, However, Here at debate. Org, We are serious in debate. I suggest a banner: To debate, We are serious. |
![]() |
KIng_Bob2 forfeited this round.
oops |
![]() |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
KIng_Bob2 | LOL98700z | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not forfeit. Con did. Con did not give an argument instead of questions. Pro answered those questions and Con forfeited the next Round. Since there were only 3 Rounds Con used 1 for acceptance, another for questions and the last to forfeit.
Thank you for the compliment but I wouldn't consider myself smart or intelligent.