is it possible to be a hero in the modern world
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Shadowhuntress
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 5/26/2014 | Category: | Society | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,587 times | Debate No: | 55442 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)
Many people, infact,believe that heroes existed only in the past .However, this belief is wrong because nowadays there are many heroes such as doctors,firefighters, etc they are all saving our lives so anyone can be a hero in the modern world
Your position (Con) does not match the statement you gave above, but I will debate this to the best of my ability. As pro, I assumed I would be saying there are heroes in the modern world, but con seems to be saying that. I will debate which ever side my opponent does not support. |
![]() |
Nadine1997 forfeited this round.
Considering pro has not made his/her position clear, I cannot post a sufficient argument. Considering an unclear position and forfeiting of my opponent, please vote Con |
![]() |
Nadine1997 forfeited this round.
*shrugs* I can do nothing. |
![]() |
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 7 years ago
Nadine1997 | Shadowhuntress | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con argues for the wrong side, and then forfeits.
Vote Placed by schachdame 7 years ago
Nadine1997 | Shadowhuntress | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Well, this was messy. Position of debate initiator unclear, arguments and rebuttal impossible, forfeit. Effort-Point for Pro.
Vote Placed by Progressivist 7 years ago
Nadine1997 | Shadowhuntress | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: .. Conduct to Pro, as con forfeited the round and thus rendered Pro unable to argue.
You've taken the con opinion as to suggest that your answer is "no, it is not possible".