The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

moon-landing hoax

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
faithy1234 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2017 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 588 times Debate No: 100255
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




fake photoes taken in earth they are full of mistakes


I'm just going to assume that you believe it's fake because of the way you worded the title. Just to get it out of the way, here are the common arguments for the moon landing hoax, and my arguments against them.

The footprints are intact:
The moon hasn't eroded like rock on the earth. They also hold their shape stays the same because of the vacuum of space. If you want a full explanation, you can watch the myth busters episode "NASA moon landing."

The flag is moving:
The only reason why it's moving is because the astronauts are moving the flag into place. The flag looked rippled because it was folded.

The second stage had no flame:
The rocket used Arizona 50 and an oxidizer. As they were in a vacuum, the flame was hard to see.

Why aren't we going to the moon now?:
This isn't very popular, but I used to believe it was a hoax (and then I looked up evidence for both sides), but I asked this a lot.
The reason why is because NASA has such a small budget and we have no reason to go there.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by m8 3 years ago
So if someone were to accept, which side would they be taking?
Posted by Colos 3 years ago
This will be... interesting to say the least. Also, please use spellcheck for your argument.
Posted by MagicAintReal 3 years ago
Yeah, but you're Con on whetehr or not it was a hoax.
You'd want to be Pro for this resolution.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.