The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
frankfurter50
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

morality=survival truth

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
frankfurter50
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/7/2017 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 665 times Debate No: 98771
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (17)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

if a gigantic powerful highly advanced friendly warrior robot crash lands on earth without possibility of escape, that if threatened or in the face of violence will protect anyone and itself, does it make sense to attack it?
frankfurter50

Con

OF COURSE you wouldn't attack it!

it's friendly, and it's not threatening, so there's no point in attacking it! if you attacked it, we would all die.

i mean, it's like shooting at optimus prime, you know? he's the GOOD guy. and he'd probably kill us if we attacked him too.

make buddies with the robot. no point in dying for no reason.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

yes only an idiot would attack it
frankfurter50

Con

now, just a minute, sir!

in round one, you pose the question, "does it make sense to attack it?'

you are taking the PRO side of this debate, therefore you are arguing that it DOES make sense to attack it. YOU tell me why we should attack it.

please, do not agree with me. that is not the point of this site.

i await your final argument.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

attacking it is clearly suicide
frankfurter50

Con

is this some sort of strange joke?

judges, i encourage you to vote for me. i follow the rules at least.

don't blow that robot up!
Debate Round No. 3
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by frankfurter50 1 year ago
frankfurter50
you fancy yourself to be a comedian, don't you?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
hehehe
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
who?
Posted by frankfurter50 1 year ago
frankfurter50
you know, asylum. where the crazy guys live.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
huh
Posted by frankfurter50 1 year ago
frankfurter50
what asylum do you come from?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
yes only an idiot would attack it
Posted by frankfurter50 1 year ago
frankfurter50
it kills you! didn't you see that in the first round?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
if you attack the robot what happens?
Posted by Bennett91 1 year ago
Bennett91
And yet you take the Pro position. And in our last debates you call me religious, which has nothing to with the debate. And you never even explain what the title of the debate has to do with morality or truth or what survival entails in the subject of the debate. All you do is put out one liners and act like you know something so obvious - yet it's pretty clear how vague you are is because you have nothing to articulate.

You are the one spamming this stupid debate and complains no one gets it - you are not somehow wiser or edgy - you're just another example of a person that belongs on reddit's i'm14andthisisdeep. Do you ever wonder why you only have a 20% win rate after being in over 800 debates?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Bennett91 1 year ago
Bennett91
vi_spexfrankfurter50Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro asks would it be smart to attack a friendly robot - Con says no because it could potentially kill you, and you shouldn't make enemies with a friend with that potential. Pro then agrees with Con, conceding the debate.