nerds "candy"
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
KhalifV
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/22/2014 | Category: | Music | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 916 times | Debate No: | 59404 | ||
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)
 Con  Pro Well con has not fulfilled his BoP. He has given no reason for nerds being nasty. Nerds are sweet and come in a plethora of flavors lots of people love. You can even make little jokes out of the name. And check out this cute picture of nerds candy: Plus what tastes good is subjective. Who are you to call them objectively nasty? I say there not. BoP unfulfilled by con vote pro. (Im a nerd) <3 |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by kinsky 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: pro said vote pro, so I shall do so
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: con had no arguments
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro actually made an argument
Vote Placed by Zarroette 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con's bare assertion was noted by Pro, thus that is enough to win the debate.
Vote Placed by Phoenix61397 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't meet their BoP
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| fdsaBIG | KhalifV | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had actual points, rebutted Con's points.
