The Instigator
Pro (for)
5 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
5 Points

parents being in trouble for their childs actions

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/30/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 737 times Debate No: 53710
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)




I think parents should be in trouble for their childrens actions because they are the ones who raised them.


I think that children who are very young (between the ages of 0-8) are not responsible for their behaviour, as they do not have superior cognitive abilities, nor are they able to properly think for themselves, apart from what their parents have taught them, but children between the age of 9 and 18 most definitely are able to discern what they should and should not do in society.

Just as a disclaimer, I actually agree with the Pro arguer. I am merely arguing for the Con side, however, to increase my skills at arguing for things I don't necessarily believe.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Shadowhuntress 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't really give facts or proof.
Vote Placed by SebUK 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: No resources have been used and no spelling mistake , Cons argument was more detailed and seemed more convincing .

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.