The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
2 Points

privacy vs security

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/21/2017 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 923 times Debate No: 104080
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




I think security is more important than privacy because If you cant say or type something that would get the cops suspicious about you then don't type at all in that cause and if people have less privacy cops can find more online terrorists so in that cause security is more important than privacy.


Since this is a 1-round debate, I'd like to respond with a single quote.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Arganger 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: I wish this was more than one round. But any whom, con's quote wins him the sources. He was the only one to use a source. As con didn't expand on his quote, in all reality it is only pro who made an argument. Winning pro the "more convincing arguments".

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.