should students have 6th block
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
WrickItRalph
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 2/27/2019 | Category: | Society | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 442 times | Debate No: | 120535 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)
people should not have 6th block because people skip it anyways and when they skip it they get marked truant and then they have to go to the office and they have to explain why they weren't in that class.
Well the students skip the other blocks too. Don't want them marked truant for that. So why don't we just get rid of the other blocks too? This would be like saying that murder should be illegal because they're just gonna get caught. The personal responsibility falls on the student to show up to class. This sets a good example for the workforce. If you walk out an hour on an employer, They will not just mark you truant, They'll fire you. |
![]() |
but students who have class go but then they just stop going to class.
"but students who have class go but then they just stop going to class. " Answer me this question. Whose fault would that be if the student failed? Personal responsibility is key here. Really think about this. Could you get away with this at a job? Maybe once or twice, But then you've broke the trust with your boss and you're screwed if you actually need to call off for something. Unless you can't prove that kids are curing cancer during 6th block. I'm gonna have to reject this. |
![]() |
abunkley forfeited this round.
p |
![]() |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by K_Michael_Tolman 3 years ago

Report this Comment
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
abunkley | WrickItRalph | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con barely gave an argument in Round 2. So basically forfeited 2 Rounds.