The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

should there be a 1 child limit

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
ewsbsk has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/8/2018 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 343 times Debate No: 107736
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




More than one child should be illegal because babies cost money and they poop and pee in your pants and you have to pay for them to go to school and you have to pay for them to eat and stuff like that


All of the arguments my opponent makes are personal choices for a family. People who can afford to have more children or prefer to have more children shouldn't be restricted because other people can't afford or prefer not to have more than one child. A major example of my opponents idea being a failure is what happened in China. Families would be forced to get rid of children because they already had one,. Also, many families chose to abort their female babies, because they preferred male, as males carry on the family name.

Only allowing one child will only fuel the genocidal abortion problem that America already has. The population would drop drastically, and the US would become a weaker country as a result. One child policies don't work
Debate Round No. 1


more childeren, in other words $ - $ = bankrupt and babies are useless they do nothing but eat your food and sh1t thier pants
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.