The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

should video games be considered a sport

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
debateandcode has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/25/2017 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 2,638 times Debate No: 103295
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)




the definition of a sport is:
"an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature, as racing, baseball, tennis, golf, bowling, wrestling, boxing, hunting, fishing, etc."


Hi, thank you for the debate, can't wait to get this under way.

First off, I'd like to note that the opposition fails to cite a source on his definition.

Let's break down the definition you provided:
"An athletic activity"
The definition I'll be using for athletic is "of or relating to athletes; involving the use of physical skills or capabilities, as strength, agility, or stamina:" (1)
Video games require quite a bit of physical skill, and a good example is first person shooters. To be able to make the precise movements needed to be successful in the game requires skill.

"requiring skill or physical prowess"
Again, we'll have to define skill here:
"the ability, coming from one's knowledge, practice, aptitude, etc., to do something well:" (2)
As stated above, being able to make precise movements with a mouse or controller requires skill, and can be constantly improved with practice. Video games don't require physical prowess.

"often of a competitive nature"
Certain games are incredibly competitive, and can offer multiple million dollar prize pools at the top levels. Examples include the upcoming Dota 2 tournament, "The International", which has a $20 million dollar prize pool (3), that top teams can compete for and CS:GO's PGL Major Krakow with a 1 million dollar prize pool (4). Both games are already competitive in nature, but with the added prize pool, it's hard to make a case about them not being competitive.

So to recap, I've proved that video games are an athletic activity, require skill, and are competitive, which fits the definition Con provided in his opening round

Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by UnworthyPineapple 2 years ago
Well, you look at rocket league fro example, people to compete in a gaming "arena." Even though you dont physically move (unless you have that VR stuff) your a challenging your mind through competitive play. I would only call games that play multiplayer as cometitive. Not a campaign.
Posted by Luxray2854 2 years ago
Naruto, I sent you a debate challenge. Let's debate this if you have a strong opinion.
Posted by Naruto_Usumaki 2 years ago
Honestly video games aren't a sport and no matter what you say, It will never be the same as a sport. Sure it requires Logical Thinking and has Grand Prizes and Physical Extrusion on the thumbs, However doesn't make it anywhere near as physically active as a sport.
Posted by Luxray2854 2 years ago
I'd love to debate that with you, did you get my challenge?
Posted by FanboyMctroll 2 years ago
Video games are not a sport, they are a leisure activity done in the comfort of your couch with a bag of potato chips. There is absolutely no physical exertion used outside of twiddling your thumbs.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.