The Instigator
Pro (for)
1 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

ultimate team battle

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/8/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 791 times Debate No: 27037
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Well there have been a few of these going around and I wanted to try my my hand at it.
here's how it works. each of us chose 5 characters from culture (comics, movies, books etc.) for our team. They are equipped as they would normally be. I will reveal 2 of them so my opponent can not chose units that will have an advantage. The next turn I will shoe the rest. There will be five classes, and each creature you chose must fit in one of the classes, but you still chose the creature. The battle will take place in a grassy plain, with short grass and shrubs. There are no other people. No unit may go higher than 3000 meters, lower than 1000 meters, or leave the battle field, witch is 1000 by 2000 meters.

class 1-scout
scouts will be you weakest unit in terms of physical strength. They must have fast and/ or agile (super) powers . They may also be a character whose main ability is brains.

class 2- support
this unit will have an ability that buffs you other units, or provides cover. This unit should also fill the role of helping where ever needed
(example= a red dragon)

class 3- tank
this unit has extreme stamina. he/she also has limited long range
(example= the hulk)

class 4- fighter
this class is all around balanced and good. This unit also is better in close combat
(example=batman )

class 5- long range.
this class takes out enemies from afar, of at a distance, preferring to stay out of combat.
(example= sniper from team fortress)

A few rules

1. No insanely powerful charaters with no aperant weakness, sutch as goku, or super man.

2. No character may have an unlimited abilty, like limetless regeneration.

3. each charater must have a varifyable scorce

4. No giant charates (over 15 meters tall) sutch as gundams, but units that can grow are O.K. as long as they don't leave the boundrys

5. if there are multiple versions of a character, you must chose 1 version

6. no mind control or shape shifting

round 1
i give the rules and two of my creatures
round 2
my oponent gives all of his, and exlpains how he will win
round 3
I give the rest of my creatures and explain how i will win
round 4 and 5.
we argue about our ideas

now my 2 creatures

suport class - the Wendigo (native american version)

tank class- warhammer 40k leman russ primarch


I accept.
Debate Round No. 1


Ok well you have not said youre creatures, but i will say the rest if my creatures and my general stratagy

scout- shadowcat (xmen)

fighter- venom (spiderman)

long range- deadshot (batman)

leman russ will head my attack. He will charge in bolter ablaze, with venom. deadshot will snipe enemies from afar. The wendigo will sumon a hail for cover, and some wolves to aid him. shadowcat will pull under ground anything that is not deastroyed allready. you go...


emospongebob527 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


my opponent has not posted his team nor his strategy. with no team that is an automatic win for me. Also, I believe that my opponent should lose conduct points for not abiding the round structure, and not posting his argument.


emospongebob527 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


Lion forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4


Lion forfeited this round.


Check out my house Chris.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by emj32 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: I would like to check out Chris's house