"unlimited paradox" - an ever present unlimited force does not exist
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
dairygirl4u2c
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/25/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 693 times | Debate No: | 59513 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)
 Pro can the unlimited limit itself? if not, it is not unlimited. if so, it is not unlimited. thus, we can see by probing a few questions about what it means to be unlimited, that it does not really exist, at least in terms of being ever present.  Con There are no limitations to those possibilities, we take the risk every day we breathe. |
 |
|
Pro if random chance was truly unlimited, it'd be such that it could "do anything", which is not the case with random chance. and even if it was able to do anything, it can't surmount the probing questions i gave about limiting itself or not limiting itself, without contradicting itself. Con |
 |
|
Pro Con |
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| dairygirl4u2c | Max.Wallace | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Force =/= chance
I'm not accepting this debate regardless, but if I wanted to....
the number, Pi, has unlimited decimals. Therefore it exists. It is used to find the circumference and diameter and is a number with unlimited/infinite decimals afterwards. They are not limited, as this is the property of a circle.
If you are referring to an unlimited powerful god trying to contradict himself, then please clarify this.
your opening is confusing and could be beaten with semantics and/or lack of definition.
by what our previous debate, I am assuming you are referring to the "Unstoppable force meets Immovable object" in terms of unlimited?
Would need you to clarify, or simply state "anything that is unlimited applies"