ur mom should have aborted u
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
NiamC
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/26/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,283 times | Debate No: | 59575 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (4)
your mom should have aborted you
u use up resources and wed all be better off if u didnt exist Ok, I am against the infamous dairygirl4u2c. Pro, sort out your grammar and spelling? Ok, so the topic is “Ur mom should have aborted u”; clearly controversial. As I am con in this debate, I will argue against this resolution but I will not have to argue that my “mother” should not have aborted me due to the fact that I do not have to uphold any BOP. But indeed, the BOP is on you to show why my mother should have aborted me. Anyway, please present your arguments. In other words... I ACCEPT! (This is not a troll debate).
|
![]() |
u use resourzez an zpace that should go to better peeps. u dont desrve ... none of it. me n my peeps do. if ur mom aborted you hen i woldnt have to debate this . the only reason i do is becaues u werent abortion
"u use resourzez an zpace that should go to better peeps. u dont desrve" What could factor towards me not deserving any resources or any space to live in. Think about this; I live in a town which has a land area size of 48 km^2. The population is around 118,000 people; therefore, we can calculate that each person has over 250 meters^2 of living space. This is more than adequate living space. The negates the question on whether I should have been aborted due to me apparently not deserving any space to live in. Well I deserve the space and this right shouldn't be taken away from me due to the fact that there isn't a need for more living space in terms of the general consensus. You have not shown why I don't deserve any resources. http://en.wikipedia.org... https://www.google.co.uk... "if ur mom aborted you hen i woldnt have to debate this" This is tautological and irrelevant to this debate. Moven on please/ My opponent has made numerous spelling mistakes and has failed to uphold the BOP Vote Me! |
![]() |
con be a space hoe. he likez 2 pimp himself out 2 git more zpace.
TAUTOLOGICAL AND IRRELEVANT hellz ya, hellz ya hella kewl |
![]() |
Post a Comment
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by Material_Girl 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by DeletedUser 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by debatewiz 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Ragnar 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Max.Wallace 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by NiamC 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LogicalLunatic 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by NiamC 7 years ago

Report this Comment
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
dairygirl4u2c | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: I can't believe it. The first full 7-point loss in the 7-point system, without a concession and without any forfeits in the debate. Conduct--space whore was such an insult, S and G, as always diarygirl was absolutely horrid, pro didn't try to do any even remotely upholding arguments, and con was only one to use sources
Vote Placed by Ragnar 7 years ago
dairygirl4u2c | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 4 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: CONDUCT: This is obviously a troll debate, con attempted to treat it as anything else in an attempt to get a free win (claiming it's not a troll debate, was the closest thing they had a a joke). Con even posted in the forums to complain of pro's misconduct, to get sympathy votes. S&G: Much like cat memes, I would have found the jokes far more appealing without so many intentional misspellings (therefore spelling greatly distracted from arguments). ARGUMENTS: This is a troll debate, the BoP for troll debates is causing laughter. Pro never made me outright laugh, but I did get a snicker or two. Con never tried any humor. ... I admit I disagree with con's assertion that had con's mother not birthed him there would be no debate, as it would just be someone else debating; yet such a bad fallacy was funny to me. SOURCES: Not enough evidence provided to win this (it did not significantly support or hinder the arguments of either side... yes con is from a town, so what?)
Vote Placed by Max.Wallace 7 years ago
dairygirl4u2c | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 4 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was correct in the fact that if Con was aborted then the debate would not have to take place, that is the only fact I could find.
Vote Placed by Romanii 7 years ago
dairygirl4u2c | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: No real argument from Pro... no capitalization either... and a lot of name calling... lol