The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

vote stuff

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
CJames has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/28/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 268 times Debate No: 96487
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




religion shouldnt be able to vote for or against itself.. like a smoker shouldnt be able to vote for or against cigarettes.. or a child vote for or against there being playgrounds on every corner of every street.. like with churches


Your argument basically says that those with the most to lose, should get no say in the political processes that influence them. Here in the US that would mean Blacks should have no say in Civil rights, Women no say on equality, Gun owners no say on gun legislation, etc.

This entirely defeats the purpose of any democratic or republic type system. In your case, people with no vested interest in the topic make the decisions for those who do have.

How do you see this as being an improvement to society at all?
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.