Total Posts:20|Showing Posts:1-20
Jump to topic:

Some lolz

Anonymous
7/17/2013 8:22:00 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
I enjoy reading people's book lists on their profile page... and speculating on the extent to which they are liars about what they've read. I mean really, if you are a dumbass, I'm not going to believe that you've read works of hard philosophy or economics. I'm just not.
Anonymous
7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Anonymous
7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending -and obviously so. That is to say nothing of the other instances to which you refer.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Anonymous
7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.
Anonymous
7/17/2013 9:57:11 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Yeah, well the vast majority of my books are fiction.

Wonder what that says about me. ;)
Subutai
Posts: 4,315
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 9:57:41 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
That's why I don't list any specific books I've read; just the genres I typically read.
We are not dead. We have never lived. - Varg Vikernes, "Det som en gang var"
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:00:40 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:57:11 PM, DetectableNinja wrote:
Yeah, well the vast majority of my books are fiction.

Wonder what that says about me. ;)

That you like to read fiction.

If you want a good LOL, take a look at GWL-CPA's book list...
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:02:30 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:00:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:57:11 PM, DetectableNinja wrote:
Yeah, well the vast majority of my books are fiction.

Wonder what that says about me. ;)

That you like to read fiction.

If you want a good LOL, take a look at GWL-CPA's book list...

I didn't actually laugh out loud because people are in bed, but on the inside, I had a good chuckle.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:14:40 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.

Does it REALLY bother you this much, Ike? I mean, half the time YYW is just being facetious. You take things awfully serious on here.
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:14:59 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.

Yes! Yes! That! That, indeed! That!

But really, it's because I think it's funny when people lie about reading books...
Eitan_Zohar
Posts: 2,659
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 10:15:09 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.

What the hell are you two doing to this site?
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:16:04 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Although, I guess a person could read a book, not understand it, and still claim to hold it among their favorites... so maybe the user I spoke of isn't lying...
Anonymous
7/17/2013 10:17:16 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:15:09 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.

What the hell are you two doing to this site?

A personal water closet?
Eitan_Zohar
Posts: 2,659
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/17/2013 11:35:15 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 7/17/2013 10:17:16 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:15:09 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:11:37 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 10:02:11 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:59:00 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:53:57 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:46:57 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:37:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:35:23 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 7/17/2013 9:18:17 PM, YYW wrote:
At 7/17/2013 8:38:26 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Deep life insight. Thanks bro.

Was not talking about you, btw.

I'm pretty sure his point sustains regardless. Time and again I accuse you of sheer unfiltered, unmitigated arrogance, and time and again you deny it (unargumentatively) and, this is the part that really confounds me, time and again you say things with a tone and purport that would justifiably lead to the same accusation. So, really I want you to help me out here, in what manner can the OP be read without the stench of condescension?

There, I was being condescending

we're making progress. Now my question is why?

Take a guess.

hmm, because you have an overwhelming superiority complex? :P

Clearly. Those keen powers of deduction never fail you, do they, Ike?

Well when you replace defense with retort, there are only a few things one could deduce from that - namely an under-compensated lack of the former.

What the hell are you two doing to this site?

A personal water closet?

Hmmm?

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.