Are the "religious prechers on here"... ?

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

At 8/10/2013 9:53:59 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

A bit of information in computer binary code is a 0 and a 1. This contrast is needed to form a change, which is needed to form any kind of language and a direction of where that language will go.

For example; If we only had a "0" in binary code, it would be impossible to form a variety of information. There wouldn't be any changes or direction to form language or information that can be understood.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000....................... would be a meaningless string of information.

So by putting a "1" in this code, a change can be made to give us meaningful information to form a language or information that can be understood such as a picture in a monitor or robotic movements.

A wavebit of energy vibrates so it has a change in it from the high point of the vibration to the low point. This change is what makes it a bit of information.

If a wavebit of energy didn't vibrate, then no it couldn't possibly be called information. It would be a flat-line like this;

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ................................... This straight line doesn't have any way of giving us information.

If I take this line and put some bumps in it like this;

___________> _____________________////////_________________000___________ ............. Now I have some changes in this line to give me a variety to understand something.

So the vibrations of wavebits of energy is information to give us a defined world to live in. These vibrations are information that gives us the senses to see, smell, hear, taste, touch and feel emotions but they have to be converted from one form of information (energy) to another form of information ( energy ) to give us a variety of life experiences.

We can experience many things with computer binary 0's and 1's but they are very limited compared to wavebits of energy that go on for infinity. For example; we can't taste, smell or touch the things we view in the monitor as pictures and videos.

We can feel emotions, hear sound and see things by looking at a monitor but that's all. This is what I mean by 0's and 1's having limitations.

I can write books on just this subject alone but I hope you can understand that I know things without having to study science journals like science students have to.

At 8/10/2013 10:08:35 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:53:59 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

A bit of information in computer binary code is a 0 and a 1. This contrast is needed to form a change, which is needed to form any kind of language and a direction of where that language will go.

Mhmm.

For example; If we only had a "0" in binary code, it would be impossible to form a variety of information. There wouldn't be any changes or direction to form language or information that can be understood.

The variation can be used to represent meaning, and only one variation could only represent one thing.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000....................... would be a meaningless string of information.

No. It could mean many things, there could also be many numbers in that system.

So by putting a "1" in this code, a change can be made to give us meaningful information to form a language or information that can be understood such as a picture in a monitor or robotic movements.

The birth of computation.

A wavebit of energy vibrates so it has a change in it from the high point of the vibration to the low point. This change is what makes it a bit of information.

You're saying wavebits are digital?

If a wavebit of energy didn't vibrate, then no it couldn't possibly be called information. It would be a flat-line like this;

Not necessarily. What if it rotated? Changed colour? Changed size?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ................................... This straight line doesn't have any way of giving us information.

If I take this line and put some bumps in it like this;

___________> _____________________////////_________________000___________ ............. Now I have some changes in this line to give me a variety to understand something.

There are four different kinds of bits there.

So the vibrations of wavebits of energy is information to give us a defined world to live in. These vibrations are information that gives us the senses to see, smell, hear, taste, touch and feel emotions but they have to be converted from one form of information (energy) to another form of information ( energy ) to give us a variety of life experiences.

Why vibrations? I can see why you'd imagine that, and it might be true eventually (particles vibrate and there's the electromagnetic spectrum too), but why do chemicals have to vibrate in a binary (sounds like digitally as well) fashion to be what they are? I mean right down at the bottom of reality, it might do that, but why in a binary digital fashion? What is energy? It seems like it has to be more then information.

We can experience many things with computer binary 0's and 1's but they are very limited compared to wavebits of energy that go on for infinity. For example; we can't taste, smell or touch the things we view in the monitor as pictures and videos.

But we could create ways for computer bits to transfer that kind of information, smellovision etc.

We can feel emotions, hear sound and see things by looking at a monitor but that's all. This is what I mean by 0's and 1's having limitations.

You might think that sounds profound, but it is obviously incorrect. Sure zeros and ones have limitations, but it's not because they're ones and zeros necessarily, more the practicality of the machines we create. We can create smell from this information, for example.

I can write books on just this subject alone but I hope you can understand that I know things without having to study science journals like science students have to.

LOL. You've created a butchered science which you mixed with your own imagination and is demonstrably incorrect. The only refuge you had was how vague you were when describing your beliefs.

At 8/10/2013 10:19:17 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 10:08:35 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:53:59 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

A bit of information in computer binary code is a 0 and a 1. This contrast is needed to form a change, which is needed to form any kind of language and a direction of where that language will go.

Mhmm.

For example; If we only had a "0" in binary code, it would be impossible to form a variety of information. There wouldn't be any changes or direction to form language or information that can be understood.

The variation can be used to represent meaning, and only one variation could only represent one thing.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000....................... would be a meaningless string of information.

No. It could mean many things, there could also be many numbers in that system.

So by putting a "1" in this code, a change can be made to give us meaningful information to form a language or information that can be understood such as a picture in a monitor or robotic movements.

The birth of computation.

A wavebit of energy vibrates so it has a change in it from the high point of the vibration to the low point. This change is what makes it a bit of information.

You're saying wavebits are digital?

If a wavebit of energy didn't vibrate, then no it couldn't possibly be called information. It would be a flat-line like this;

Not necessarily. What if it rotated? Changed colour? Changed size?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ................................... This straight line doesn't have any way of giving us information.

If I take this line and put some bumps in it like this;

___________> _____________________////////_________________000___________ ............. Now I have some changes in this line to give me a variety to understand something.

There are four different kinds of bits there.

So the vibrations of wavebits of energy is information to give us a defined world to live in. These vibrations are information that gives us the senses to see, smell, hear, taste, touch and feel emotions but they have to be converted from one form of information (energy) to another form of information ( energy ) to give us a variety of life experiences.

Why vibrations? I can see why you'd imagine that, and it might be true eventually (particles vibrate and there's the electromagnetic spectrum too), but why do chemicals have to vibrate in a binary (sounds like digitally as well) fashion to be what they are? I mean right down at the bottom of reality, it might do that, but why in a binary digital fashion? What is energy? It seems like it has to be more then information.

We can experience many things with computer binary 0's and 1's but they are very limited compared to wavebits of energy that go on for infinity. For example; we can't taste, smell or touch the things we view in the monitor as pictures and videos.

But we could create ways for computer bits to transfer that kind of information, smellovision etc.

We can feel emotions, hear sound and see things by looking at a monitor but that's all. This is what I mean by 0's and 1's having limitations.

You might think that sounds profound, but it is obviously incorrect. Sure zeros and ones have limitations, but it's not because they're ones and zeros necessarily, more the practicality of the machines we create. We can create smell from this information, for example.

I can write books on just this subject alone but I hope you can understand that I know things without having to study science journals like science students have to.

LOL. You've created a butchered science which you mixed with your own imagination and is demonstrably incorrect. The only refuge you had was how vague you were when describing your beliefs.

I can't answer any of your sound arguments against my points, so I will continue to talk nonsense which is only a little bit related to what you said and distract you away from your sound arguments. I will say how humans didn't create anything, because the potential was there already or because it was "God" who told them to, even though it seems far more logical that humans do in fact create things. I will continue to pretend that the human transmission of information via computers using bits of ones and zeros is somehow intrinsic and inherent to our reality, thinking it makes me sound profound, even though you've pointed out how silly it is.

(AlbinoBunny edit)

At 8/10/2013 11:08:11 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 10:19:17 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 10:08:35 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:53:59 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

A bit of information in computer binary code is a 0 and a 1. This contrast is needed to form a change, which is needed to form any kind of language and a direction of where that language will go.

Mhmm.

For example; If we only had a "0" in binary code, it would be impossible to form a variety of information. There wouldn't be any changes or direction to form language or information that can be understood.

The variation can be used to represent meaning, and only one variation could only represent one thing.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000....................... would be a meaningless string of information.

No. It could mean many things, there could also be many numbers in that system.

So by putting a "1" in this code, a change can be made to give us meaningful information to form a language or information that can be understood such as a picture in a monitor or robotic movements.

The birth of computation.

A wavebit of energy vibrates so it has a change in it from the high point of the vibration to the low point. This change is what makes it a bit of information.

You're saying wavebits are digital?

If a wavebit of energy didn't vibrate, then no it couldn't possibly be called information. It would be a flat-line like this;

Not necessarily. What if it rotated? Changed colour? Changed size?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ................................... This straight line doesn't have any way of giving us information.

If I take this line and put some bumps in it like this;

___________> _____________________////////_________________000___________ ............. Now I have some changes in this line to give me a variety to understand something.

There are four different kinds of bits there.

So the vibrations of wavebits of energy is information to give us a defined world to live in. These vibrations are information that gives us the senses to see, smell, hear, taste, touch and feel emotions but they have to be converted from one form of information (energy) to another form of information ( energy ) to give us a variety of life experiences.

Why vibrations? I can see why you'd imagine that, and it might be true eventually (particles vibrate and there's the electromagnetic spectrum too), but why do chemicals have to vibrate in a binary (sounds like digitally as well) fashion to be what they are? I mean right down at the bottom of reality, it might do that, but why in a binary digital fashion? What is energy? It seems like it has to be more then information.

We can experience many things with computer binary 0's and 1's but they are very limited compared to wavebits of energy that go on for infinity. For example; we can't taste, smell or touch the things we view in the monitor as pictures and videos.

But we could create ways for computer bits to transfer that kind of information, smellovision etc.

We can feel emotions, hear sound and see things by looking at a monitor but that's all. This is what I mean by 0's and 1's having limitations.

You might think that sounds profound, but it is obviously incorrect. Sure zeros and ones have limitations, but it's not because they're ones and zeros necessarily, more the practicality of the machines we create. We can create smell from this information, for example.

I can write books on just this subject alone but I hope you can understand that I know things without having to study science journals like science students have to.

LOL. You've created a butchered science which you mixed with your own imagination and is demonstrably incorrect. The only refuge you had was how vague you were when describing your beliefs.

I can't answer any of your sound arguments against my points, so I will continue to talk nonsense which is only a little bit related to what you said and distract you away from your sound arguments. I will say how humans didn't create anything, because the potential was there already or because it was "God" who told them to, even though it seems far more logical that humans do in fact create things. I will continue to pretend that the human transmission of information via computers using bits of ones and zeros is somehow intrinsic and inherent to our reality, thinking it makes me sound profound, even though you've pointed out how silly it is.

(AlbinoBunny edit)

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Are the "religious prechers on here"... Trolls or are they serious?

At 8/10/2013 12:46:41 PM, wiploc wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Are the "religious prechers on here"... Trolls or are they serious?

Poe's law: http://en.wikipedia.org...

At 8/10/2013 12:16:47 PM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 11:08:11 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 10:19:17 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 10:08:35 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:53:59 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:28:26 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 9:05:16 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:59:50 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:57:30 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:55:35 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:44:08 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:29:37 AM, bulproof wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created and I'll decide whether you are sane or not.

Read my post called, "The Truth".

Read it yourself and answer my question. Or to afraid god?

God had me write it so I don't need to read it. I've already witnessed the end of this age and how we were created so why would I need to listen to you?

"God whispered wavebits into existence"? That is extremely vague, so much so that it really isn't credible at all. You failed.

A wavebit of energy is a bit of information. Where do you think information came from?

The explanation is too vague for me to consider it to be credible.

A bit of information in computer binary code is a 0 and a 1. This contrast is needed to form a change, which is needed to form any kind of language and a direction of where that language will go.

Mhmm.

For example; If we only had a "0" in binary code, it would be impossible to form a variety of information. There wouldn't be any changes or direction to form language or information that can be understood.

The variation can be used to represent meaning, and only one variation could only represent one thing.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000....................... would be a meaningless string of information.

No. It could mean many things, there could also be many numbers in that system.

So by putting a "1" in this code, a change can be made to give us meaningful information to form a language or information that can be understood such as a picture in a monitor or robotic movements.

The birth of computation.

A wavebit of energy vibrates so it has a change in it from the high point of the vibration to the low point. This change is what makes it a bit of information.

You're saying wavebits are digital?

If a wavebit of energy didn't vibrate, then no it couldn't possibly be called information. It would be a flat-line like this;

Not necessarily. What if it rotated? Changed colour? Changed size?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ................................... This straight line doesn't have any way of giving us information.

If I take this line and put some bumps in it like this;

___________> _____________________////////_________________000___________ ............. Now I have some changes in this line to give me a variety to understand something.

There are four different kinds of bits there.

So the vibrations of wavebits of energy is information to give us a defined world to live in. These vibrations are information that gives us the senses to see, smell, hear, taste, touch and feel emotions but they have to be converted from one form of information (energy) to another form of information ( energy ) to give us a variety of life experiences.

Why vibrations? I can see why you'd imagine that, and it might be true eventually (particles vibrate and there's the electromagnetic spectrum too), but why do chemicals have to vibrate in a binary (sounds like digitally as well) fashion to be what they are? I mean right down at the bottom of reality, it might do that, but why in a binary digital fashion? What is energy? It seems like it has to be more then information.

We can experience many things with computer binary 0's and 1's but they are very limited compared to wavebits of energy that go on for infinity. For example; we can't taste, smell or touch the things we view in the monitor as pictures and videos.

But we could create ways for computer bits to transfer that kind of information, smellovision etc.

We can feel emotions, hear sound and see things by looking at a monitor but that's all. This is what I mean by 0's and 1's having limitations.

You might think that sounds profound, but it is obviously incorrect. Sure zeros and ones have limitations, but it's not because they're ones and zeros necessarily, more the practicality of the machines we create. We can create smell from this information, for example.

I can write books on just this subject alone but I hope you can understand that I know things without having to study science journals like science students have to.

LOL. You've created a butchered science which you mixed with your own imagination and is demonstrably incorrect. The only refuge you had was how vague you were when describing your beliefs.

I can't answer any of your sound arguments against my points, so I will continue to talk nonsense which is only a little bit related to what you said and distract you away from your sound arguments. I will say how humans didn't create anything, because the potential was there already or because it was "God" who told them to, even though it seems far more logical that humans do in fact create things. I will continue to pretend that the human transmission of information via computers using bits of ones and zeros is somehow intrinsic and inherent to our reality, thinking it makes me sound profound, even though you've pointed out how silly it is.

(AlbinoBunny edit)

No comment means you have no knowledge to disprove our Creator's wisdom of how He created us.

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

At 8/10/2013 3:30:18 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:
Why address his case? He is essentially saying everything can be described in terms of wavebits. This adds no new information, but instead creates an unfalsifiable unverifiable claim which by necessity is meaningless. So we can concede and not change our position, for none of that claim affects any position one can possibly hold.

At 8/10/2013 5:04:14 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 3:30:18 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:
Why address his case? He is essentially saying everything can be described in terms of wavebits. This adds no new information, but instead creates an unfalsifiable unverifiable claim which by necessity is meaningless. So we can concede and not change our position, for none of that claim affects any position one can possibly hold.

He added bits when I pressed him which are obviously incorrect. Like the fact that our binary and digital information transmission can't allow people to receive smells, which just is not true. Strange that "God" wouldn't tell him that. :P

At 8/10/2013 5:17:31 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:

At 8/10/2013 5:04:14 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 3:30:18 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:
Why address his case? He is essentially saying everything can be described in terms of wavebits. This adds no new information, but instead creates an unfalsifiable unverifiable claim which by necessity is meaningless. So we can concede and not change our position, for none of that claim affects any position one can possibly hold.

He added bits when I pressed him which are obviously incorrect. Like the fact that our binary and digital information transmission can't allow people to receive smells, which just is not true. Strange that "God" wouldn't tell him that. :P

He'll correct to become unfalsifiable through use of liturgical language and vague phrases akin to analogies.

At 8/10/2013 8:26:31 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 8:23:07 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:56:36 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 7:54:15 AM, bornofgod wrote:

At 8/9/2013 6:22:49 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
Trolls or are they serious? Maybe it's just how silly they are which makes me notice, but a lot of the topics started by religious people on here are, well, kind of insane. They make other religious people look kind of bad to be honest. Do you think that's what they're trying to do?

God isn't religious but there are many in here who preach with religious ideas that deceive themselves and everyone who listens to them.

God isn't existent.

Tell me exactly how you were created so that I won't doubt you. If you can do this, then I'll accept your belief that God is not existent.

Sexual reproduction. Why do you have this need to know answers? Not just search for them, but need to know them so badly, that you make up the answers from your imagination, and don't even search for evidence for/against them, in case that destroys one of your "answers"?

At 8/10/2013 11:17:04 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 5:17:31 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:

At 8/10/2013 5:04:14 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 3:30:18 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:
Why address his case? He is essentially saying everything can be described in terms of wavebits. This adds no new information, but instead creates an unfalsifiable unverifiable claim which by necessity is meaningless. So we can concede and not change our position, for none of that claim affects any position one can possibly hold.

He added bits when I pressed him which are obviously incorrect. Like the fact that our binary and digital information transmission can't allow people to receive smells, which just is not true. Strange that "God" wouldn't tell him that. :P

He'll correct to become unfalsifiable through use of liturgical language and vague phrases akin to analogies.

That too. He sort of just pretended like it was never said and started talking about something else. lmao

At 8/10/2013 5:04:14 PM, AlbinoBunny wrote:

At 8/10/2013 3:30:18 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:
Why address his case? He is essentially saying everything can be described in terms of wavebits. This adds no new information, but instead creates an unfalsifiable unverifiable claim which by necessity is meaningless. So we can concede and not change our position, for none of that claim affects any position one can possibly hold.

He added bits when I pressed him which are obviously incorrect. Like the fact that our binary and digital information transmission can't allow people to receive smells, which just is not true. Strange that "God" wouldn't tell him that. :P